Suppr超能文献

在FAME研究中,吡仑帕奈作为局灶性发作患者的首个辅助治疗:剂量相关疗效、安全性及与反应相关的临床因素分析

Perampanel as First Adjunctive Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in the FAME Study: Analyses of Dose-Related Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Factors Associated with Response.

作者信息

Kim Dong Wook, Kim Ji Hyun, Lee Sang Kun, Lee Sang Ahm, Lee Ji Woong, Kim Min Young, Seo Dae-Won

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Epilepsy Res. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):6-12. doi: 10.14581/jer.22002. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Perampanel is approved for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without secondary generalized seizures. The FAME (Fycompa as first Add-on to Monotherapy in patients with Epilepsy; NCT02726074) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of perampanel added to monotherapy in patients with FOS with or without secondary generalized seizures (SGS). analyses of the FAME study assessed potential predictors of response and an in-depth evaluation of the safety and efficacy of perampanel.

METHODS

Efficacy was assessed by reduction of total seizure frequency by ≥50%, ≥75% or 100%, and safety by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for treatment response were performed.

RESULTS

Most patients (82/85) received perampanel doses of 4-8 mg/day during maintenance therapy and the highest efficacy rates were achieved with 4 mg/day, irrespective of efficacy outcome. Doses of 4 or 6 mg/day in patients with FOS with SGS (n=16) produced comparable efficacy outcomes. In multivariate analysis, total perampanel dose was predictive of 50% and 75% response rates; longer total perampanel administration period with 50% response; and concomitant non-anti-seizure medication with a 100% response. Patients developed a TEAE more frequently during the 12-week titration period (60.2%) than the 24-week maintenance period (28.4%), including dizziness (45.5% vs. 9.1%), somnolence (10.2% vs. 0%), and headache (4.5% vs. 3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

analyses show that even low doses of perampanel may be effective and TEAEs are usually self-limited or well-tolerated.

摘要

背景与目的

吡仑帕奈已被批准用于辅助治疗伴有或不伴有继发性全面性发作的局灶性发作(FOS)。FAME(吡仑帕奈作为癫痫患者单药治疗的首个添加药物;NCT02726074)研究评估了吡仑帕奈添加到单药治疗中对伴有或不伴有继发性全面性发作(SGS)的FOS患者的疗效和安全性。FAME研究的分析评估了反应的潜在预测因素,并对吡仑帕奈的安全性和疗效进行了深入评估。

方法

通过将总发作频率降低≥50%、≥75%或100%来评估疗效,通过治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率以及导致停药的TEAE来评估安全性。对治疗反应进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析。

结果

大多数患者(82/85)在维持治疗期间接受4-8毫克/天的吡仑帕奈剂量,无论疗效结果如何,4毫克/天的疗效最高。伴有SGS的FOS患者(n = 16)中,4或6毫克/天的剂量产生了相当的疗效结果。在多因素分析中,吡仑帕奈总剂量可预测50%和75%的反应率;吡仑帕奈总给药期较长可预测50%的反应率;同时使用非抗癫痫药物可预测100%的反应率。患者在12周滴定期(60.2%)比24周维持期(28.4%)更频繁地出现TEAE,包括头晕(45.5%对9.1%)、嗜睡(10.2%对0%)和头痛(4.5%对3.4%)。

结论

分析表明,即使是低剂量的吡仑帕奈也可能有效,且TEAE通常是自限性的或耐受性良好。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Precision medicine and therapies of the future.精准医学与未来疗法。
Epilepsia. 2021 Mar;62 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S90-S105. doi: 10.1111/epi.16539. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Development of perampanel in epilepsy.吡仑帕奈在癫痫治疗中的研发。
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013(197):3-8. doi: 10.1111/ane.12098.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验