Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;10:857472. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857472. eCollection 2022.
At the end of 2019, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, experienced the ravages of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In a few months, infected people rose to tens of thousands. This study aimed to explore the mental health status of military nurse personnel assisting (non-Hubei area) in the fight against COVID-19 and local nurse personnel (in the Wuhan area), as well as the differences in mental health status between nurses and COVID-19 patients that provide a reference basis for psychological crisis intervention. A convenience sampling method was used to select frontline nurses and COVID-19 patients (sample size 1,000+) from two mobile cabin hospitals from January to March 2020. The questionnaire consists of socio-demographic information, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7), General Mental Health Service Questionnaire and Work Intensity and Physical Status Questionnaire. The results showed that depression was present in 117 nurses (19.73%) and 101 patients (23.33%) with PHQ-9 scores >10; anxiety was present in 60 nurses (10.12%) and 54 patients (12.47%) with GAD-7 >10. The anxiety and depression levels of nurses in Wuhan area were higher than those in non-Hubei area. The differences in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores were also statistically significant ( < 0.001) when comparing patients from different regions, with anxiety and depression rates of 30.19 and 16.04% in local patients and 16.74 and 9.50% in foreign patients. The comparison between nurses and patients showed that the nurses were more depressed than the patients, while the patients were more anxious. Local nurses in Wuhan had a higher workload intensity than aid nurses (77.72 vs. 57.29%). Over 95% of frontline nurses and patients reported that they had not received any form of psychological counseling before the COVID-19 outbreak. 12.87% (26/194) of frontline nurses in Wuhan had a history of taking hypnotic drugs. However, fewer patients (16/212, 7.55%) took medication than frontline nurses. Anxiety and depression levels were far higher among local nurses and patients in Wuhan than in non-Hubei areas. The nurses had higher levels of depression, while the patients had higher anxiety levels. Providing targeted mental health services to healthcare professionals and patients is necessary when experiencing the impact of a major event.
2019 年底,中国湖北省武汉市遭遇了 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的肆虐。短短几个月内,感染人数上升到数万。本研究旨在探讨援助(非湖北地区)抗击 COVID-19 的军队护士人员和当地护士人员(武汉地区)的心理健康状况,以及护士与 COVID-19 患者之间心理健康状况的差异,为心理危机干预提供参考依据。采用便利抽样法,于 2020 年 1 月至 3 月从两家方舱医院选取一线护士和 COVID-19 患者(样本量 1000+)。问卷包括社会人口学信息、患者健康问卷 9(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍 7(GAD-7)、一般心理健康服务问卷和工作强度及身体状况问卷。结果显示,PHQ-9 评分>10 的抑郁症状见于 117 名护士(19.73%)和 101 名患者(23.33%);GAD-7 评分>10 的焦虑症状见于 60 名护士(10.12%)和 54 名患者(12.47%)。武汉地区护士的焦虑和抑郁水平高于非湖北地区。不同地区患者的 PHQ-9 和 GAD-7 评分差异也有统计学意义(<0.001),本地患者的焦虑和抑郁率为 30.19%和 16.04%,外地患者分别为 16.74%和 9.50%。护士与患者比较显示,护士的抑郁程度高于患者,而患者的焦虑程度高于护士。武汉本地护士的工作量强度高于援助护士(77.72%比 57.29%)。超过 95%的一线护士和患者报告在 COVID-19 爆发前没有接受过任何形式的心理咨询。武汉的 194 名一线护士中,有 12.87%(26 人)有服用催眠药物的历史。然而,服用药物的患者(16/212,7.55%)比一线护士少。武汉本地护士和患者的焦虑和抑郁水平远高于非湖北地区。护士的抑郁程度较高,而患者的焦虑程度较高。在经历重大事件的影响时,有必要向医护人员和患者提供有针对性的心理健康服务。