两种紧急环甲膜切开术器械的比较。

A comparison between two emergency cricothyroidotomy instruments.

作者信息

Ravlo O, Bach V, Lybecker H, Møller J T, Werner M, Nielsen H K

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987 May;31(4):317-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02575.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02575.x

Abstract

As part of a training programme for younger doctors, two commercially available, emergency cricothyroidotomy sets were evaluated. Prior to the surgical procedure, half of the doctors in each group received an audiovisual lesson. In a simulated but realistic emergency situation, involving autopsy material, cricothyroidotomy was performed utilizing either the "Nutrake" or the "Gentofte" system. The audiovisual lesson increased the speed and the success rate of the doctors performing this procedure as well as strengthening their confidence. Both systems allowed positive pressure ventilation. The participating doctors achieved a higher success rate at a faster speed with the "Nutrake" set.

摘要

作为年轻医生培训计划的一部分，对两种市售的紧急环甲膜切开术套件进行了评估。在手术前，每组中有一半的医生接受了视听课程。在涉及尸检材料的模拟但逼真的紧急情况下，使用“Nutrake”或“Gentofte”系统进行环甲膜切开术。视听课程提高了医生进行该手术的速度和成功率，并增强了他们的信心。两种系统都允许进行正压通气。参与的医生使用“Nutrake”套件以更快的速度取得了更高的成功率。