Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 远程医疗准备情况:对美国心脏病学实践的横断面评估。

COVID-19 telehealth preparedness: a cross-sectional assessment of cardiology practices in the USA.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Healthcare Innovation Laboratory, Prebys Cardiovascular Institute, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA 92037,USA.

出版信息

Per Med. 2022 Sep;19(5):411-422. doi: 10.2217/pme-2021-0179. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced medical practices to augment healthcare delivery to remote and virtual services. We describe the results of a nationwide survey of cardiovascular professionals regarding telehealth perspectives. A 31-question survey was sent early in the pandemic to assess the impact of COVID-19 on telehealth adoption & reimbursement. A total of 342 clinicians across 42 states participated. 77% were using telehealth, with the majority initiating usage 2 months after the COVID-19 shutdown. A variety of video-based systems were used. Telehealth integration requirements differed, with electronic medical record integration being mandated in more urban than rural practices (70 vs 59%; p < 0.005). Many implementation barriers surfaced, with over 75% of respondents emphasizing reimbursement uncertainty and concerns for telehealth generalizability given the complexity of cardiovascular diseases. Substantial variation exists in telehealth practices. Further studies and legislation are needed to improve access, reimbursement and the quality of telehealth-based cardiovascular care.

摘要

译文

新冠疫情迫使医疗实践增加远程和虚拟服务来提供医疗保健。我们描述了一项针对心血管专业人员的全国性调查,以了解他们对远程医疗的看法。在疫情早期,我们发送了一份包含 31 个问题的调查问卷,以评估新冠疫情对远程医疗采用和报销的影响。共有来自 42 个州的 342 名临床医生参与了调查。77%的人在使用远程医疗,大多数人在新冠疫情封锁后两个月开始使用。使用了各种基于视频的系统。远程医疗的集成要求存在差异,在城市地区,电子病历的集成是强制性的,而在农村地区则不然(70%比 59%;p<0.005)。许多实施障碍浮出水面,超过 75%的受访者强调报销的不确定性,以及考虑到心血管疾病的复杂性,对远程医疗通用性的担忧。远程医疗的实践存在很大差异。需要进一步的研究和立法来改善远程医疗的可及性、报销和心血管护理的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验