• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国与美国食管癌亚型的生存情况比较。

The survival of esophageal cancer by subtype in China with comparison to the United States.

机构信息

National Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2023 Jan 15;152(2):151-161. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34232. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.34232
PMID:35913753
Abstract

Adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are the main subtypes of esophageal cancer (EC), but nationwide survival of both EC subtypes has never been reported in China. Our study aimed to estimate the survival trends of EC by subtype in China and compare them with those in the United States for the same period. We used data from 64 Chinese cancer registries, which included EC patients diagnosed during 2008 and 2015 and followed up until 31st December 2017. The 5-year age-standardized relative survival by subtype, sex, age group and urban or rural area between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. We stratified survival estimates by calendar period (2008-2009, 2010-2011, 2012-2014 and 2015-2017). Data from the SEER 18 program were calculated to estimate the survival of EC in the United States. A further comparison between the survivals in areas covered and not covered by population-based endoscopic screening programs in China was conducted. A total of 129 962 records were included in the survival analyses. Results revealed that age-standardized 5-year relative survivals for AC and SCC increased in both China and the United States from 2008 to 2017. In 2015 to 2017, 5-year survival from both subtypes in China was better than the United States (SCC: 36.9% vs 18.5%, AC: 34.8% vs 22.3%). The survival for both subtypes was significantly higher in screening areas than in nonscreening areas in China (SCC: 40.6% vs 32.8%; AC: 43.0% vs 31.3%). A survival gap in EC by subtype exists between China and the United States. Our results may support the beneficial effect of population-based endoscopic screening for survival, and may be poised to inform national policy-making in both countries.

摘要

腺癌(AC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)是食管癌(EC)的主要亚型,但中国从未报告过这两种 EC 亚型的全国生存率。我们的研究旨在估计中国 EC 亚型的生存趋势,并将其与同期美国的情况进行比较。我们使用了来自 64 个中国癌症登记处的数据,这些数据包括 2008 年至 2015 年期间诊断出的 EC 患者,并随访至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。分析了 2008 年至 2017 年期间按亚型、性别、年龄组和城乡划分的 5 年年龄标准化相对生存率。我们按日历时间(2008-2009 年、2010-2011 年、2012-2014 年和 2015-2017 年)对生存估计进行分层。使用 SEER 18 计划的数据计算了美国 EC 的生存率。进一步比较了中国覆盖和未覆盖人群内镜筛查计划地区的生存率。生存分析共纳入 129962 例患者。结果显示,2008 年至 2017 年,中国和美国的 AC 和 SCC 的年龄标准化 5 年相对生存率均有所提高。2015 年至 2017 年,中国两种亚型的 5 年生存率均优于美国(SCC:36.9% vs 18.5%,AC:34.8% vs 22.3%)。中国筛查地区的两种亚型生存率均明显高于非筛查地区(SCC:40.6% vs 32.8%;AC:43.0% vs 31.3%)。中国和美国之间存在 EC 亚型的生存差距。我们的结果可能支持基于人群的内镜筛查对生存的有益影响,并可能为两国的国家决策提供依据。

相似文献

1
The survival of esophageal cancer by subtype in China with comparison to the United States.中国与美国食管癌亚型的生存情况比较。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Jan 15;152(2):151-161. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34232. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
Impact of prior malignancy on outcomes of stage IV esophageal carcinoma: SEER based study.基于 SEER 的研究:既往恶性肿瘤对 IV 期食管癌结局的影响。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;12(4):417-423. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1426458. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Comparison of endoscopic therapies and surgical resection in patients with early esophageal cancer: a population-based study.内镜治疗与手术切除治疗早期食管癌患者的比较:基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):224-232.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
4
Effect of histologic subtype on treatment and outcomes for esophageal cancer in the United States.组织学亚型对美国食管癌治疗和结局的影响。
Cancer. 2012 Jul 1;118(13):3268-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26608. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
5
Trends in esophageal cancer incidence by histology, United States, 1998-2003.1998 - 2003年美国按组织学分类的食管癌发病率趋势
Int J Cancer. 2008 Sep 15;123(6):1422-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23691.
6
Incidence and survival of neuroendocrine neoplasms in China with comparison to the United States.中国神经内分泌肿瘤的发病率和生存率与美国的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 May 20;136(10):1216-1224. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002643. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
International trends in oesophageal cancer survival by histological subtype between 1995 and 2014.1995 年至 2014 年间,按组织学亚型划分的食管癌生存的国际趋势。
Gut. 2021 Feb;70(2):234-242. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321089. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis.1973年至2009年美国成年人食管癌生存率趋势:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;31(6):1141-6. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13289.
9
Comparative evaluation of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the different histological subtypes of esophageal cancer (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of esophagus).比较不同组织学亚型食管癌(食管鳞状细胞癌和腺癌)患者血清 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2012 Feb;26(2):73-81. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21486.
10
Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于人群的中国内镜食管癌筛查的特征和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 1;9:e45360. doi: 10.2196/45360.

引用本文的文献

1
Silencing of PIGU inhibits the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.PIGU基因沉默通过PI3K/AKT信号通路抑制食管鳞状细胞癌的进展。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08748-y.
2
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Hybrid Approach Based on Muscle Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer.基于肌肉成像特征的机器学习与深度学习混合方法用于食管癌诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 8;15(14):1730. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141730.
3
Enhancing survival in locally advanced esophageal cancer: a comparative analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus conventional neoadjuvant therapies using the SEER database.
提高局部晚期食管癌的生存率:使用监测、流行病学与结果(SEER)数据库对新辅助免疫疗法与传统新辅助疗法的比较分析
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):2778-2801. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1905. Epub 2025 May 28.
4
Research status and progress of deep learning in automatic esophageal cancer detection.深度学习在食管癌自动检测中的研究现状与进展
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 May 15;17(5):104410. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.104410.
5
Cost effectiveness analysis of Barrett's esophagus screening: A systematic review.巴雷特食管筛查的成本效益分析:一项系统评价。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar;75:101980. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2025.101980. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
FGFR3 amplification is predictive of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.FGFR3基因扩增可预测食管鳞状细胞癌患者的不良预后。
Virchows Arch. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8.
7
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions and early esophageal carcinoma: Analysis of efficacy and serum tumor markers.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管 precancerous 病变及早期食管癌:疗效与血清肿瘤标志物分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):103700. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103700.
8
The application of artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal cancers.人工智能在上消化道癌症中的应用。
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Dec 27;5(2):113-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.12.006. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Global trends and epidemiological shifts in gastrointestinal cancers: insights from the past four decades.胃肠道癌症的全球趋势与流行病学转变:过去四十年的洞察
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1002/cac2.70017.
10
Exploratory analyses of the associations between Ki-67 expression, lymph node metastasis, and prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.食管鳞状细胞癌患者中Ki-67表达、淋巴结转移与预后之间关联的探索性分析。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 26;13:e19062. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19062. eCollection 2025.