Van Tongeren Daryl R, DeWall C Nathan, Van Cappellen Patty
Department of Psychology, Hope College.
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jan;152(1):98-119. doi: 10.1037/xge0001269. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
People often favor their ingroup and derogate members of the outgroup. However, less is known about "religious dones," who used to identify as religious but no longer do and have more transitional identities. Across six studies ( = 5,001; four preregistered), we examined the affiliative tendencies of religious dones and how they are perceived by other religious groups. In Study 1, using a Cyberball paradigm, religious dones included atheist targets relative to Christian targets. In Studies 2 and 3, currently religious participants demonstrated an attenuated tendency to commit the conjunction fallacy (i.e., associating people with heinous acts of violence) for religious dones compared to never religious targets. In Study 4, using a behavioral sacrifice paradigm (e.g., reducing compensation to reduce an uncomfortable noise blast to a partner), religious dones favored never religious partners (who did not reciprocate) and did not sacrifice as much for currently religious partners (who sacrificed for them as a member of their ingroup). Studies 5 and 6, investigating belief and identity, revealed that religious dones hold favorable attitudes toward other dones (and former believers) and the never religious (and never believers), whereas other groups view dones "in the middle." We also identified mediating mechanisms of trust, ingroup identification, and belief superiority. Taken together, these six studies suggest that religious dones are viewed as "a sheep in wolf's clothing," in which they are treated favorably by currently religious individuals but often prefer never religious individuals, even though that warmth is not consistently reciprocated. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
人们通常会偏袒自己所属的内群体,诋毁外群体的成员。然而,对于“曾经的宗教信徒”,即那些过去认同宗教但现在不再认同且具有更多过渡性身份的人,我们了解得较少。在六项研究(N = 5001;四项预先注册)中,我们考察了曾经的宗教信徒的归属倾向以及他们如何被其他宗教群体看待。在研究1中,使用Cyberball范式,曾经的宗教信徒将无神论者目标纳入其中,而相对忽视基督教目标。在研究2和3中,与从未有过宗教信仰的目标相比,目前有宗教信仰的参与者在将曾经的宗教信徒与令人发指的暴力行为联系起来(即合取谬误)时,这种倾向有所减弱。在研究4中,使用行为牺牲范式(例如,减少报酬以减少给同伴带来的不舒服的噪音冲击),曾经的宗教信徒更倾向于从未有过宗教信仰的同伴(这些同伴不会回报),并且不会为目前有宗教信仰的同伴做出同样多的牺牲(这些同伴作为内群体成员为他们做出了牺牲)。研究5和6调查了信仰和身份,结果显示曾经的宗教信徒对其他曾经的信徒(以及前信徒)和从未有过宗教信仰的人(以及从未信教者)持有积极态度,而其他群体则将曾经的信徒视为“处于中间状态”。我们还确定了信任、内群体认同和信仰优越性的中介机制。综合来看,这六项研究表明,曾经的宗教信徒被视为“披着羊皮的狼”,即他们受到目前有宗教信仰的人的优待,但往往更喜欢从未有过宗教信仰的人,尽管这种善意并没有得到一致的回报。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)