Dang Rebecca, Schroeder Alan R, Weng Yingjie, Wang Marie E, Patel Anisha I
Department of Pediatrics (R Dang, AR Schroeder, ME Wang, AI Patel), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif.
Department of Pediatrics (R Dang, AR Schroeder, ME Wang, AI Patel), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif.
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Mar;23(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
Temperature measurement plays a central role in determining pediatric patients' disease risk and management. However, current pediatric temperature thresholds may be outdated and not applicable to children.
To characterize pediatric temperature norms and variation by patient characteristics, time of measurement, and thermometer route.
In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 134,641 well-child visits occurring between 2014-2019 at primary care clinics that routinely measured temperature. We performed bivariate and multivariable quantile regressions with clustered standard errors to determine temperature percentiles and variation by age, sex, time of measurement, and thermometer route. We performed sensitivity analyses: 1) using a cohort that excluded visits with infectious diagnoses that could explain temperature aberrations and 2) including clinic as a fixed effect.
The median rectal temperature for visits of infants ≤12 months old was 37.2˚C, which was 0.4˚C higher than the median axillary temperature. The median axillary temperature for children 1-18 years old was 36.7˚C, which was 0.1˚C lower than the median values of all other routes. The 99th percentile for rectal temperatures in infants was 37.8˚C and the 99.9th percentile for axillary temperatures in children was 38.5˚C. Adjusted analyses did not demonstrate clinically significant variation in temperature by sex, age, or time of measurement.
These updated temperature norms can serve as reference values in clinical practice and should be considered in the context of thermometer route used and the clinical condition being evaluated. Variations in temperature values by sex, age, and time of measurement were not clinically significant.
体温测量在确定儿科患者的疾病风险和管理中起着核心作用。然而,当前的儿科体温阈值可能已过时,并不适用于儿童。
根据患者特征、测量时间和体温计测量部位来描述儿科体温规范及变化情况。
在这项横断面研究中,我们分析了2014年至2019年间在常规测量体温的基层医疗诊所进行的134,641次儿童健康检查。我们进行了具有聚类标准误的双变量和多变量分位数回归,以确定按年龄、性别、测量时间和体温计测量部位划分的体温百分位数及变化情况。我们进行了敏感性分析:1)使用一个排除了可能解释体温异常的感染性诊断就诊病例的队列;2)将诊所作为固定效应纳入分析。
≤12个月婴儿就诊时的直肠温度中位数为37.2˚C,比腋窝温度中位数高0.4˚C。1至18岁儿童的腋窝温度中位数为36.7˚C,比所有其他测量部位的中位数低0.1˚C。婴儿直肠温度的第99百分位数为37.8˚C,儿童腋窝温度的第99.9百分位数为38.5˚C。校正分析未显示按性别、年龄或测量时间划分的体温存在临床显著差异。
这些更新后的体温规范可作为临床实践中的参考值,应结合所使用的体温计测量部位和所评估的临床状况来考虑。按性别、年龄和测量时间划分的体温值差异无临床意义。