• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基于学习策略认知科学的翻转课堂模式在药物治疗学课程中的影响。

Evaluating the impact of a flipped classroom model based on cognitive science of learning strategies in a pharmacotherapy course.

机构信息

Pharmacy Practice, University of Kansas, School of Pharmacy - Wichita Regional Campus, 1010 N. Kansas St., Bldg. 92, Suite 2331, Wichita, KS 67214, United States.

University of Kansas, School of Pharmacy, 2010 Becker Dr., Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Jul;14(7):840-846. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.022. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.022
PMID:35914844
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a flipped classroom method based on cognitive science of learning strategies on student performance and experience in a third-year pharmacotherapy course.

METHODS

The cognitive science of learning flipped classroom (CSL-FC) strategies in this study included pre-class learning (Preview), in-class application to cases (Retrieval), after-class learning (Spaced Retrieval), and post-module reflection (Deliberate Reflection) in a required pharmacotherapy course. During fall 2017, one instructor piloted the CSL-FC method. During fall 2018, this method expanded to four instructors. All other instructors used traditional lecture-based methods. The same multiple-choice exam questions were used both years. The average exam question scores between teaching methods were compared by independent t-test. Student focus groups were conducted after the 2017 semester. In 2018, students were surveyed using a 5-point Likert rating (1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree) to evaluate their experience.

RESULTS

The 2017 and 2018 classes included 132 and 137 students, respectively. During the two years, exam question scores were significantly better with CSL-FC (n = 136 questions) compared to traditional (n = 110 questions) (88.8% vs 84.9%, respectively; P = .02). The focus group analysis revealed three main themes including a "love-hate relationship," "time," and "it works." Student agreement to the survey question "the cognitive science of learning flipped classroom helped me learn" was 2.18 (SD 1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a flipped classroom approach based on cognitive science of learning strategies positively impacted student performance and experience in a pharmacotherapy course.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在确定基于学习策略认知科学的翻转课堂方法对三年级药物治疗课程中学生表现和体验的影响。

方法

本研究中的学习策略认知科学翻转课堂(CSL-FC)策略包括课前学习(预习)、课堂案例应用(检索)、课后学习(间隔检索)和模块后反思(刻意反思)在一门必修的药物治疗课程中。2017 年秋季,一位教师试点了 CSL-FC 方法。2018 年秋季,该方法扩展到四位教师。所有其他教师都使用传统的基于讲座的方法。这两年都使用相同的多项选择题。通过独立 t 检验比较两种教学方法的平均考试问题得分。2017 学期后进行了学生焦点小组讨论。2018 年,学生使用 5 分李克特量表(1=非常同意,5=非常不同意)进行调查,以评估他们的体验。

结果

2017 年和 2018 年的课程分别包括 132 名和 137 名学生。在这两年中,与传统方法(n=110 个问题)相比,基于认知科学的翻转课堂(CSL-FC)(n=136 个问题)的考试问题得分明显更好(分别为 88.8%和 84.9%;P=0.02)。焦点小组分析揭示了三个主要主题,包括“爱恨交加”、“时间”和“它有效”。学生对“学习策略认知科学翻转课堂有助于我学习”这一调查问题的认同度为 2.18(SD 1.12)。

结论

基于学习策略认知科学的翻转课堂方法的实施对药物治疗课程中学生的表现和体验产生了积极影响。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of a flipped classroom model based on cognitive science of learning strategies in a pharmacotherapy course.评估基于学习策略认知科学的翻转课堂模式在药物治疗学课程中的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Jul;14(7):840-846. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.022. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching today's undergraduates.翻转课堂能激发更强的学习效果,是一种面向当今本科生的21世纪现代教学方法。
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jul;93(7):3722-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9087.
3
The flipped classroom: a novel approach to physical examination skills for osteopathic medical students.翻转课堂:一种针对骨科医学生体检技能的新型教学方法。
J Osteopath Med. 2021 Feb 26;121(5):475-481. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0198.
4
Learning Outcomes and Student Preferences with Flipped vs Lecture/Case Teaching Model in a Block Curriculum.在块状课程中,翻转课堂与传统讲授/案例教学模式的学习成果和学生偏好。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7044. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7044.
5
Flipping around the classroom: Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing students' satisfaction and achievement.翻转课堂:护理学理学学士加速课程学生的满意度与学业成绩
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
Effectiveness of flipped classroom with Poll Everywhere as a teaching-learning method for pharmacy students.将“Poll Everywhere”作为教学方法的翻转课堂对药学专业学生的有效性。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;48(Suppl 1):S41-S46. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.193313.
7
Acquisition of Higher-Order Cognitive Skills (HOCS) Using the Flipped Classroom Model: A Quasi-Experimental Study.采用翻转课堂模式培养高阶认知技能(HOCS):一项准实验研究。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 18;14(4):e24249. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24249. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Flipped classroom versus a didactic method with active learning in a modified team-based learning self-care pharmacotherapy course.在一个基于小组学习的自我护理药物治疗课程中,翻转课堂与采用主动学习的讲授法的对比。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Dec;11(12):1287-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
9
Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains.翻转课堂与学生学习:不止于表面收获。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Mar;40(1):47-55. doi: 10.1152/advan.00098.2015.
10
Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting.为成功而翻转:评估一种新型教学方法在研究生阶段的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Feb 28;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2.