Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):e061834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061834.
To investigate factors that promote and prevent the use of compression therapy in people with venous leg ulcers.
Qualitative interview study with nurses using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).
Three National Health Service Trusts in England.
Purposive sample of 15 nurses delivering wound care.
Nurses described factors which made provision of compression therapy challenging. Organisational barriers (TDF domains environmental context and resources/knowledge, skills/behavioural regulation) included heavy/increasing caseloads; lack of knowledge/skills and the provision of training; and prescribing issues (variations in bandaging systems/whether nurses could prescribe). Absence of specialist leg ulcer services to refer patients into was perceived as a barrier to providing optimal care by some community-based nurses. Compression use was perceived to be facilitated by clinics for timely initial assessment; continuity of staff and good liaison between vascular/leg ulcer clinics and community teams; clear local policies and care pathways; and opportunities for training such as 'shadowing' in vascular/leg ulcer clinics. Patient engagement barriers (TDF domains goals/beliefs about consequences) focused on getting patients 'on board' with compression, and supporting them in using it. Clear explanations were seen as key in promoting compression use.
Rising workload pressures present significant challenges to enhancing leg ulcer services. There may be opportunities to develop facilitated approaches to enable community nursing teams to make changes to practice, enhancing quality of patient care. The majority of venous leg ulcers could be managed in the community without referral to specialist community services if issues relating to workloads/skills/training are addressed. Barriers to promoting compression use could also be targeted, for example, through the development of clear patient information leaflets. While the patient engagement barriers may be easier/quicker to address than organisational barriers, unless organisational barriers are addressed it seems unlikely that all people who would benefit from compression therapy will receive it.
调查促进和阻碍静脉溃疡患者使用压迫疗法的因素。
使用理论领域框架(TDF)对护士进行定性访谈研究。
英格兰的三个国民保健信托基金。
提供伤口护理的 15 名护士的目的性样本。
护士描述了提供压迫疗法具有挑战性的因素。组织障碍(TDF 领域环境背景和资源/知识、技能/行为调节)包括工作量大/增加;缺乏知识/技能和提供培训;以及处方问题(绷带系统的变化/护士是否可以开处方)。一些社区护士认为,缺乏专门的腿部溃疡服务来转介患者,这是提供最佳护理的障碍。一些社区护士认为,及时进行初始评估的诊所、工作人员的连续性以及血管/腿部溃疡诊所和社区团队之间的良好联络、明确的当地政策和护理途径,以及在血管/腿部溃疡诊所“跟踪”等培训机会,有助于使用压迫疗法。患者参与障碍(TDF 领域目标/对后果的信念)主要集中在让患者“接受”压迫疗法,并支持他们使用。明确的解释被认为是促进压迫疗法使用的关键。
工作量压力的增加对加强腿部溃疡服务带来了重大挑战。如果解决与工作量/技能/培训相关的问题,可能有机会开发促进社区护理团队改变实践的方法,提高患者护理质量。如果解决与工作量/技能/培训相关的问题,大多数静脉腿部溃疡可以在社区中得到管理,无需转介给专门的社区服务。促进压迫疗法使用的障碍也可以作为目标,例如,通过开发明确的患者信息传单。虽然患者参与障碍可能比组织障碍更容易/更快解决,但除非解决组织障碍,否则似乎不太可能所有受益于压迫疗法的人都能接受它。