Correction: Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.
作者信息
de Jong Lubberta H, Bok Harold G J, Schellekens Lonneke H, Kremer Wim D J, Jonker F Herman, van der Vleuten Cees P M
机构信息
Department Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Educational Consultancy and Professional Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03644-9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Correction: Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.更正：在程序化评估中塑造正确的条件：叙事信息的质量如何影响高风险决策的质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03644-9.
2
Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.在方案评估中创造有利条件：叙事信息质量如何影响高风险决策质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 28;22(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03257-2.
3
Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.旁观者眼中的利害关系：国际计划评估学习感知研究。
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):654-663. doi: 10.1111/medu.13532. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.程序化评估的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2015 Jul;37(7):641-646. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Incorporating aspects of programmatic assessment into examinations: Aggregating rich information to inform decision-making.将方案评估的内容纳入考试：整合丰富的信息以辅助决策。
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):567-574. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1878122. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?在项目评估中做出学生进展决策：我们能否从临床决策和陪审团决策推断出来？
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 30;19(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1583-1.
7
Competency-based education calls for programmatic assessment: But what does this look like in practice?能力本位教育要求进行项目评估：但在实践中它是什么样子的呢？
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):1087-1095. doi: 10.1111/jep.13328. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
8
Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.额叶、纹状体和内侧颞叶对价值的敏感性在决策过程中区分了冒险型与规避风险型老年人。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12498-12509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1386-16.2016.
9
"Prevention Is Better Than Cure": A Plea to Emphasize the Learning Function of Competence Committees in Programmatic Assessment.“预防胜于治疗”：呼吁重视能力评估委员会在程序性评估中的学习功能
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 29;8:638455. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.638455. eCollection 2021.
10
A practical approach to programmatic assessment design.一种用于规划性评估设计的实用方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1169-1182. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
本文引用的文献
1
Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.在方案评估中创造有利条件：叙事信息质量如何影响高风险决策质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 28;22(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03257-2.
Zotero 插件