• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证质量恢复-15 量表的荷兰语翻译。

Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01784-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-022-01784-5
PMID:35915438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9341122/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 15-item Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale is strongly recommended as a standard patient-reported outcome measure assessing the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia in the postoperative period. This study aimed to validate the Dutch translation of the questionnaire (QoR-15NL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational, prospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia completed the QoR-15NL (preoperatively (t1) and twice postoperatively (t2 and t3)) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for general recovery at t2. A psychometric evaluation was performed to assess the QoR-15NL's validity, reliability, responsiveness, reproducibility and feasibility.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eleven patients agreed to participate (recruitment rate 94%), and 165 patients were included (completion rate 78%). The QoR-15NL score correlated with the VAS for general recovery (rs = 0.59). Construct validity was further demonstrated by confirmation of expected negative associations between the QoR-15NL and duration of surgery (rs = -0.25), duration of Post Anesthesia Care Unit stay (rs = -0.31), and duration of hospital stay (rs = -0.27). The QoR-15NL score decreased significantly according to the extent of surgery. Cronbach's alpha was 0.87, split-half reliability was 0.8, and the test-retest intra-class coefficient was 0.93. No significant floor- or ceiling effect was observed.

CONCLUSION

The QoR-15NL scale is a valid, easy-to-use, and reliable outcome assessment tool with high responsiveness for patient-reported quality of recovery after surgery and general anesthesia in the Dutch-speaking population. The QoR-15NL's measurement properties are comparable to the original questionnaire and other translated versions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not applicable.

摘要

背景

15 项术后恢复质量量表(QoR-15)被强烈推荐作为一种标准的患者报告结局测量工具,用于评估手术和麻醉后术后期间的恢复质量。本研究旨在验证该问卷的荷兰语翻译版(QoR-15NL)。

材料和方法

进行了一项观察性、前瞻性、单中心队列研究。接受全身麻醉下手术的患者在术前(t1)和术后两次(t2 和 t3)完成 QoR-15NL 问卷和视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估一般恢复情况。进行了心理测量评估,以评估 QoR-15NL 的有效性、可靠性、反应性、可重复性和可行性。

结果

211 名患者同意参与(招募率为 94%),165 名患者完成了研究(完成率为 78%)。QoR-15NL 评分与一般恢复的 VAS 评分相关(rs=0.59)。结构有效性进一步通过确认 QoR-15NL 与手术持续时间(rs=-0.25)、麻醉后护理单元停留时间(rs=-0.31)和住院时间(rs=-0.27)之间预期的负相关得到证实。QoR-15NL 评分根据手术范围显著降低。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.87,半分可靠性为 0.8,测试-重测内部类系数为 0.93。未观察到明显的地板或天花板效应。

结论

QoR-15NL 量表是一种有效的、易于使用的、可靠的工具,具有高度的反应性,可用于评估荷兰语人群手术后和全身麻醉后的患者报告的恢复质量。QoR-15NL 的测量特性与原始问卷和其他翻译版本相当。

试验注册

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5c/9341122/abcf3d129540/12871_2022_1784_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5c/9341122/f3b9867c0d6d/12871_2022_1784_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5c/9341122/abcf3d129540/12871_2022_1784_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5c/9341122/f3b9867c0d6d/12871_2022_1784_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5c/9341122/abcf3d129540/12871_2022_1784_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.验证质量恢复-15 量表的荷兰语翻译。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01784-5.
2
Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.验证 Quality of Recovery-15 问卷在讲法语人群中的翻译版本。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
3
Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.验证和临床实用的韩文版的质量恢复- 15 与手术后恢复增强:前瞻性观察队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the modified quality of recovery score for the postanaesthesia care unit (QoR-PACU)-A prospective validation study.术后恢复质量评分(QoR-PACU)改良版的心理测量学评估-一项前瞻性验证研究。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Jun;43(3):101380. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101380. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
VALIDATION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY-40 QUESTIONNAIRE ADAPTED FOR CROATIAN POPULATION.验证适用于克罗地亚人群的康复-40 问卷的质量。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Nov;62(3):426-436. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.03.4.
6
Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.丹麦版术后恢复质量评分QoR-15的翻译与验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.康复质量-15评分中文版的验证及其与术后质量康复量表的比较
Patient. 2016 Jun;9(3):251-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0148-6.
8
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.康复质量-35泰国语版的效度与信度:一项基于问卷的前瞻性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7.
9
Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.术后恢复质量评分(QoR-40)的有效性和可靠性
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
10
Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.术后恢复质量评分 QoR-15 挪威语版的翻译和验证。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jan;68(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/aas.14322. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Thai version of the quality of recovery scale (QoR-14-Thai) after elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.全身麻醉下择期腹部手术后泰国版恢复质量量表(QoR - 14 - Thai)的验证
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03044-8.
2
Effectiveness, usability, and patient satisfaction of an mHealth application with an integrated ePRO system following lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: A quasi-experimental study.腰椎退行性脊柱手术后,一款集成电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统的移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的有效性、可用性及患者满意度:一项准实验研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 20;11:20552076251324687. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324687. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale.QoR-15量表的最新最小临床重要差异
Anesthesiology. 2021 Nov 1;135(5):934-935. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003977.
2
Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.验证和临床实用的韩文版的质量恢复- 15 与手术后恢复增强:前瞻性观察队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Pulmonary and Physical Virtual Reality Exercises for Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma: Randomized Clinical Trial.
钝性胸部创伤患者的肺部和物理虚拟现实训练:随机临床试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Dec 9;12:e54389. doi: 10.2196/54389.
4
Validity and reliability study of the quality of recovery scale in Turkish.土耳其语版康复质量量表的效度和信度研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 May 3;53(5):1144-1154. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5680. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of remimazolam combined with remifentanil on quality of recovery after ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, observational study.瑞马唑仑联合瑞芬太尼对日间宫腔镜手术后恢复质量的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Jan;19(1):44-53. doi: 10.17085/apm.23102. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
6
Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a Spanish-speaking population in Colombia.哥伦比亚西班牙语人群中康复 15 问卷质量的验证与跨文化调适
BJA Open. 2023 Oct 18;8:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100231. eCollection 2023 Dec.
验证 Quality of Recovery-15 问卷在讲法语人群中的翻译版本。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
More than just morbidity and mortality - quality of recovery and long-term functional recovery after surgery.不仅仅是发病率和死亡率——手术后的恢复质量和长期功能恢复。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e143-e150. doi: 10.1111/anae.14786.
5
Factors influencing day surgery patients' quality of postoperative recovery and satisfaction with recovery: a narrative review.影响日间手术患者术后恢复质量及恢复满意度的因素:一项叙述性综述
Perioper Med (Lond). 2019 May 22;8:3. doi: 10.1186/s13741-019-0115-1. eCollection 2019.
6
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
7
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
8
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score -15: a multicentre, cohort study.瑞典版术后恢复质量评分-15的验证:一项多中心队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):893-902. doi: 10.1111/aas.13086. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia.系统评价 QoR-15 评分,一种用于测量手术和麻醉后恢复质量的患者报告结局测量工具。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.