• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults.评估修订版《国家健康结果量表65岁及以上:老年人健康量表》(HoNOS老年人版)的内容效度。
BJPsych Bull. 2023 Aug;47(4):195-202. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2022.37.
2
Assessing the Content Validity of the Revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS 2018).评估修订版《国民健康结果量表》(HoNOS 2018)的内容效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169895.
3
Reliability testing of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 2018.2018 年国民健康结果量表的可靠性测试。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Oct;31(5):927-932. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13047. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Are the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) useful for measuring outcomes in older people's mental health services?“国民健康结果量表(HoNOS)”对衡量老年人心理健康服务的结果有用吗?
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Sep;8(5):387-96. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001725063.
5
A review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS).《国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)》的综述与更新
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Apr;42(2):63-68. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2017.17. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Elderly People (HoNOS65+).《老年人国家健康成果量表》(HoNOS65+)的回顾与更新。
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Dec;42(6):248-252. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.68. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
The reliability and validity of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: validation in relation to patient derived measures.《国家健康结果量表》的信度与效度:与患者衍生测量指标相关的验证
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;34(3):504-11; discussion 520-1. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00755.x.
8
Review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for People with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD).学习障碍者健康国家结局量表(HoNOS-LD)的回顾与更新。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;69(7):1807-1813. doi: 10.1177/00207640231175773. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Does a more specified version of the HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales) increase psychometric properties of the inventory?HoNOS(国民健康结果量表)的更具体版本是否会提高量表的心理测量特性?
Psychopathology. 2011;44(4):261-71. doi: 10.1159/000322690. Epub 2011 May 6.
10
What does 'clinical significance' mean in the context of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales?在“国民健康结果量表”的背景下,“临床意义”是什么意思?
Australas Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;17(2):141-8. doi: 10.1080/10398560802460453.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of psychiatric vulnerability and neurocognitive disorders in nursing homes: impact on care levels.养老院中精神脆弱和神经认知障碍的患病率:对护理水平的影响。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01179-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The meagre outcomes of HoNOS.HoNOS 的结果不佳。
Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(2):206-209. doi: 10.1177/1039856219875066. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
Review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Elderly People (HoNOS65+).《老年人国家健康成果量表》(HoNOS65+)的回顾与更新。
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Dec;42(6):248-252. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.68. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
4
A review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS).《国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)》的综述与更新
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Apr;42(2):63-68. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2017.17. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.模板分析在定性心理学研究中的效用
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Validity of the modified richmond agitation-sedation scale for use in sedated, mechanically ventilated Swine.改良版里士满躁动-镇静量表在机械通气镇静猪中的有效性
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 Jan;51(1):63-8.
7
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 2 部分——评估受访者的理解。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
What does 'clinical significance' mean in the context of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales?在“国民健康结果量表”的背景下,“临床意义”是什么意思?
Australas Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;17(2):141-8. doi: 10.1080/10398560802460453.
9
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
10
A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures.《国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)系列测量工具的心理测量特性综述》
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Nov 28;3:76. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-76.

评估修订版《国家健康结果量表65岁及以上:老年人健康量表》(HoNOS老年人版)的内容效度。

Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults.

作者信息

Harris Meredith G, Tapp Caley, Arnautovska Urska, Coombs Tim, Dickson Rosemary, Smith Mark, Jury Angela, Lai Jennifer, James Mick, Painter Jon, Burgess Philip M

机构信息

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

BJPsych Bull. 2023 Aug;47(4):195-202. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2022.37.

DOI:10.1192/bjb.2022.37
PMID:35916442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387420/
Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA).

RESULTS

All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as 'important' or 'very important' for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts' comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended.

摘要

目的与方法

近期,《国家健康成果量表65岁及以上版》(HoNOS65+)进行了修订。来自澳大利亚和新西兰的25位专家完成了一项基于网络的匿名调查,内容涉及修订后的量表《老年人健康量表》(HoNOS OA)的内容效度。

结果

在确定老年人总体临床严重程度方面,所有12个HoNOS OA量表被大多数(≥75%)专家评为“重要”或“非常重要”。对变化的敏感性、可理解性和全面性的评分则更具差异,但大多为正面评价。专家的意见提供了可能的解释。例如,一些专家建议修改或扩充某些量表(如测量人际关系问题和日常生活活动问题的量表)的术语表示例,使其更具老年人针对性。

临床意义

专家们一致认为HoNOS OA能够测量重要的构念。可能需要对经验丰富的评分者进行培训,使其了解某些修订的基本原理。建议对HoNOS OA进行进一步的心理测量测试。