Suppr超能文献

回顾性分析 SARS-CoV 再阳性 qPCR 检测结果:它们是否提示再感染?

Retrospective review of re-positive qPCR tests for SARS-CoV: do they indicate presence of reinfection?

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakır, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Jul;26(14):5278-5284. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202207_29319.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic broke out, caused by the coronavirus called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Reinfections can be observed with various respiratory viruses, including human coronaviruses. Moreover, they may result from weak or waning initial immune response, reinfection with another genotype/subtype, or the rapid antigenic changes in the virus. The aim of this study was to investigate the likelihood of reinfection in COVID-19 patients that had a positive qPCR test result at least 60 days after a negative test result in patients that were confirmed with COVID-19 on qPCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results of a total of 105,000 samples that had been obtained between April 1, 2020, and February 1, 2021, in two separate authorized laboratories were retrospectively analyzed. 22 samples from 11 patients included in the study, qPCR tests were repeated for each sample using the Rotorgene Q PCR system with Diagnovital SARS-CoV-2 (RTA Labs, Turkey) Real-Time PCR kits. Positive samples were screened for B.1.1.7 and E484K mutations using the qPCR method on the Rotorgene Q PCR system with Bio-Speedy SARS-CoV-2 Variant Plus kits (Bioeksen Technology, Turkey).

RESULTS

The 105,000 individuals comprised 55,614 men and 49,386 women. In the qPCR test, 14,511 (13.82%) individuals were found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 11 (0.076%) patients were included in the study based on the inclusion criteria. Accordingly, the risk of reinfection was calculated as 0.076% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.056%-0.096%) and the incidence was 1.04 per 10,000 population (95% CI: 0.62-1.38 per 10,000). No patient was admitted to the intensive care unit or died during both episodes. Moreover, no B.1.1.7 or E484K mutation was detected in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The high frequency of COVID-19 infection poses serious risks for the development of new variants and the currently used vaccines are likely to lose their efficacy against new variants. To reduce these risks and to be successful in the fight against the pandemic, we suggest compliance with personal protective measures as well as rapid and widespread application of vaccination not only in developed countries but also in the whole world and the modification of currently used vaccines in such a way to fight against newly emerged variants.

摘要

目的

2019 年,由被称为严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的冠状病毒引起的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行爆发。各种呼吸道病毒都可发生再感染,包括人类冠状病毒。此外,它们可能是由于初始免疫反应较弱或减弱、再次感染另一种基因型/亚型,或病毒的快速抗原变化引起的。本研究的目的是研究至少在 COVID-19 患者 qPCR 检测结果呈阴性后 60 天,对 qPCR 确诊的 COVID-19 患者的 qPCR 检测结果呈阳性的患者再次感染的可能性。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 1 日期间在两个独立授权实验室获得的总计 105000 份样本的定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)结果。从研究中包括的 11 名患者的 22 个样本中,使用 Rotorgene Q PCR 系统(RTA Labs,土耳其)Diagnovital SARS-CoV-2(RTA Labs,土耳其)实时 PCR 试剂盒对每个样本重复进行 qPCR 检测。使用 Rotorgene Q PCR 系统(Bioeksen Technology,土耳其)Bio-Speedy SARS-CoV-2 Variant Plus 试剂盒,使用 qPCR 方法对阳性样本进行 B.1.1.7 和 E484K 突变筛查。

结果

105000 人包括 55614 名男性和 49386 名女性。在 qPCR 检测中,发现 14511 名(13.82%)个体 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性。其中,根据纳入标准,11 名(0.076%)患者被纳入研究。因此,再感染的风险计算为 0.076%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.056%-0.096%),发病率为每 10000 人 1.04 例(95%CI:每 10000 人 0.62-1.38 例)。两次发病期间,均无患者入住重症监护病房或死亡。此外,未在任何患者中检测到 B.1.1.7 或 E484K 突变。

结论

COVID-19 感染的高频率对新变体的发展构成严重威胁,目前使用的疫苗可能对新变体失去效力。为了降低这些风险并在抗击大流行方面取得成功,我们建议遵守个人防护措施,以及在发达国家乃至全世界迅速广泛地接种疫苗,并对目前使用的疫苗进行修改,以对抗新出现的变体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验