*João Marcos Nascimento Batista, MSc, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Murillo Martins Leite, MSc, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2022 Jul 1;47(4):403-411. doi: 10.2341/21-050-L.
The present study evaluated the influence of a flowable resin layer on bond strength between resin cement and a universal adhesive applied using an immediate dentin sealing (IDS) technique.
Coronary portions of bovine teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n=15). In the IDS.U group, the exposed dentin was immediately sealed with the Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE) following the self-etching protocol. In the IDS.UF group, a layer of Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) flow resin was applied over the universal adhesive. In the DDS (control) group, the dentin was kept "fresh" and delayed dentin sealing was performed. After 24 hours in distilled water at 37°C, dentin surfaces were treated with pumice, phosphoric acid, and the application of the universal adhesive in the IDS.U and IDS. UF groups. The DDS group was treated with pumice and the universal adhesive was applied. The samples received cylinders of resin cement Rely X Ultimate (3M ESPE) made with the aid of starch tubes of 0.96 mm in diameter and 2 mm in length. They were submitted to the microshear bond strength test (μSBS) at 0.5 mm/min, after 24 hours (T1) and 3 months (T2). The fracture areas were evaluated qualitatively using a DSM 300 microscope (KOZO) with 45× magnification and classified as: adhesive, cohesive in cement, cohesive in dentin, or mixed. Samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data were compared statistically between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and intra-groups using the Mann-Whitney test (α=0.05).
There were no significant differences between groups for the bond strength values (p>0.05). The IDS.UF group showed higher values at 3 months, when compared to the values of 24 hours (p<0.001). All groups showed a predominance of adhesive fracture (86.7% to 100%). SEM showed dentinal tubules exposed in the IDS.U and DDS groups; in the IDS.UF group, the tubules were completely sealed.
The flow resin can be used on the adhesive when using the IDS technique because it increased the bond strength values after 3 months and promoted effective sealing of the dentinal tubules.
本研究评估了在使用即刻牙本质封闭(IDS)技术的通用粘结剂上施加可流动树脂层对树脂粘结剂与通用粘结剂之间粘结强度的影响。
将牛牙的冠状部分随机分为六组(n=15)。在 IDS.U 组中,根据自酸蚀处理程序,在用单键通用粘结剂(3M ESPE)立即封闭暴露的牙本质后,在其上施加一层 Filtek Z350(3M ESPE)可流动树脂。在 DDS(对照)组中,保留牙本质的“新鲜”状态并进行延迟牙本质封闭。在 37°C的蒸馏水中放置 24 小时后,用浮石、磷酸处理牙本质表面,并在 IDS.U 和 IDS.UF 组中施加通用粘结剂。DDS 组用浮石处理并用通用粘结剂处理。用直径 0.96 毫米、长 2 毫米的淀粉管辅助制作 Rely X Ultimate(3M ESPE)树脂水泥的圆柱体。在 0.5 毫米/分钟的速度下进行微剪切粘结强度测试(μSBS),在 24 小时(T1)和 3 个月(T2)时进行。使用放大倍数为 45×的 DSM 300 显微镜(KOZO)对断裂区域进行定性评估,并分类为:粘结剂、粘结剂内水泥、粘结剂内牙本质或混合。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对样品进行分析。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验在组间比较数据,使用 Mann-Whitney 检验(α=0.05)在组内比较数据。
各组间粘结强度值无显著性差异(p>0.05)。与 24 小时相比,IDS.UF 组在 3 个月时显示出更高的值(p<0.001)。所有组均显示以粘结断裂为主(86.7%至 100%)。SEM 显示 IDS.U 和 DDS 组牙本质小管暴露;在 IDS.UF 组中,小管完全封闭。
在使用 IDS 技术时,可在粘结剂上使用可流动树脂,因为它在 3 个月后增加了粘结强度值,并促进了牙本质小管的有效封闭。