• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水泥选择与整体氧化锆修复体的疲劳性能。

Cement Choice and the Fatigue Performance of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations.

机构信息

Luis Felipe Guilardi, associate researcher, Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science (Prosthodontics Unit), Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil.

Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, MsciD, PhD, adjunct professor, Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science (Prosthodontics Units), Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2022 Jul 1;47(4):461-472. doi: 10.2341/20-143-L.

DOI:10.2341/20-143-L
PMID:35917240
Abstract

This study investigated the fatigue failure load of simplified monolithic yttria partially stabilized zirconia polycrystal restorations cemented to a dentin-like substrate using different luting systems. Disc-shaped ceramic (Zenostar T, 10 mm Ø × 0.7 mm thick) and dentin-like substrate (10 mm Ø × 2.8 mm thick) were produced and randomly allocated into eight groups, without or with thermocycling (TC=5-55°C/12,000×): "cement" (RelyX Luting 2 - glass ionomer cement [Ion], [Ion/TC]; RelyX U200 - self-adhesive resin cement [Self], [Self/TC]; Single Bond Universal+RelyX Ultimate - MDP-containing adhesive + resin cement [MDPAD + RC], [MDP-AD + RC/TC]; ED Primer II+Panavia F 2.0 - Primer + MDP-containing resin cement [PR + MDP-RC], [PR + MDP-RC/TC])). Each luting system was used as recommended by the manufacturer. Staircase methodology (20 Hz; 250,000 cycles) was applied for obtaining the fatigue failure loads. Fractographic characteristics were also assessed. At baseline, the Ion group presented the lowest fatigue load, although it was statistically similar to the Self group. The resin-based cement systems presented the highest fatigue performance, with the Ion group being only statistically equal to the Self group. Thermocycling influenced the groups differently. After aging, the MDP-AD + RC presented the highest mean, followed by the PR + MDP-RC and Self groups, while the Ion group had the lowest mean. Fractographic analysis depicted all failures as radial cracks starting at the zirconia intaglio surface. The luting system with MDP-containing adhesive applied prior to the resin cement presented the highest fatigue failure load after aging, presenting the best predictability of stable performance. Despite this, monolithic zirconia presents high load-bearing capability regardless of the luting agent.

摘要

本研究调查了使用不同粘固系统粘固于类似牙本质基底的简化整体氧化钇部分稳定氧化锆多晶修复体的疲劳失效负荷。制备了圆盘状陶瓷(Zenostar T,10mmØ×0.7mm 厚)和类似牙本质基底(10mmØ×2.8mm 厚),并将其随机分为 8 组,分为无热循环(TC=5-55°C/12,000×)和有热循环(TC=5-55°C/12,000×)两组:“粘固剂”(RelyX Luting 2-玻璃离子水门汀[Ion],[Ion/TC];RelyX U200-自粘接树脂水门汀[Self],[Self/TC];Single Bond Universal+RelyX Ultimate-MDP 含粘接剂+树脂水门汀[MDPAD+RC],[MDPAD+RC/TC])。每种粘固系统均按制造商的建议使用。采用阶梯法(20Hz;250,000 次循环)获得疲劳失效负荷。还评估了断裂特征。在基线时,Ion 组的疲劳负荷最低,但与 Self 组无统计学差异。树脂基粘固系统的疲劳性能最高,Ion 组仅与 Self 组有统计学差异。热循环对各组的影响不同。老化后,MDPAD+RC 组的平均疲劳失效负荷最高,其次是 PR+MDP-RC 组和 Self 组,而 Ion 组的平均疲劳失效负荷最低。断裂特征分析显示所有失效均为从氧化锆凹面开始的放射状裂纹。在老化后,使用含 MDP 粘接剂的粘固系统的疲劳失效负荷最高,表现出稳定性能的最佳可预测性。尽管如此,无论使用何种粘固剂,整体氧化锆都具有较高的承载能力。

相似文献

1
Cement Choice and the Fatigue Performance of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations.水泥选择与整体氧化锆修复体的疲劳性能。
Oper Dent. 2022 Jul 1;47(4):461-472. doi: 10.2341/20-143-L.
2
Effect of zirconia surface treatment, resin cement and aging on the load-bearing capacity under fatigue of thin simplified full-contour Y-TZP restorations.氧化锆表面处理、树脂水门汀和老化对简化全瓷 Y-TZP 修复体疲劳承载能力的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Sep;97:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.050. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Fracture resistance of monolithic translucent zirconia crown bonded with different self-adhesive resin cement: influence of MDP-containing zirconia primer after aging.单体透明氧化锆全冠与不同自粘接树脂水门汀粘结后的抗折裂性能:老化后含 MDP 的氧化锆底涂剂的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03365-5.
4
Stability of the bond between two resin cements and an yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic after six months of aging in water.两种树脂水门汀与氧化钇稳定氧化锆陶瓷之间的粘结在水中老化六个月后的稳定性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
5
Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于牙科修复的氧化锆的黏附性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Adhes Dent. 2015 Feb;17(1):7-26. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33525.
6
Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.水泥类型和陶瓷底漆对一体式氧化锆种植体上聚合物渗透陶瓷冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jan;119(1):138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
7
Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.各种黏固剂对牙本质的修复材料黏结。
Oper Dent. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):266-73. doi: 10.2341/10-236-L. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
8
Fatigue Failure Load of a Bonded Simplified Monolithic Feldspathic Ceramic: Influence of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching and Thermocycling.胶结整体式长石陶瓷的疲劳失效负荷:氢氟酸蚀刻和热循环的影响。
Oper Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):E21-E31. doi: 10.2341/19-069-L. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
9
Shear bond strength of glass ionomer and resin-based cements to different types of zirconia.玻璃离子水门汀和树脂基水泥对不同类型氧化锆的粘结强度。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Dec;32(8):806-814. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12638. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.两种带自粘接树脂水门汀的二氧化锆基台对钛的固位力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.020. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.CAD-CAM种植体支持的全瓷修复体与钛基在临床上的结合稳定性如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Mar 26;17:181-200. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S510760. eCollection 2025.