Suppr超能文献

维生素A预防随机试验中参与情况对死亡率的影响。

Influence of participation on mortality in a randomized trial of vitamin A prophylaxis.

作者信息

Tarwotjo I, Sommer A, West K P, Djunaedi E, Mele L, Hawkins B

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Jun;45(6):1466-71. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/45.6.1466.

Abstract

Mortality of Sumatran children living in villages randomized to participate in a vitamin A capsule (200,000 IU) distribution program who received the capsule (n = 9776) was compared with those who did not (n = 2447) and with children living in villages randomized to serve as control subjects (n = 12,173). During the 4 mo after completion of the first distribution, mortality among preschool capsule recipients was less than 4% that of nonrecipients (p less than 0.001). Mortality among preschool nonrecipients was three times that of controls (p less than 0.05), suggesting strong selection bias. The potential biologic impact on childhood mortality attributable to vitamin A supplementation is estimated to exceed the 34% previously derived from the more conservative intent-to-treat analysis. One capsule every 6 mo may provide adequate protection for the vast majority of children. The single major limitation to maximum impact appears to be inadequate program coverage.

摘要

将居住在被随机分配参与维生素A胶囊(200,000国际单位)分发项目的村庄中且接受了胶囊的苏门答腊儿童(n = 9776)的死亡率,与未接受胶囊的儿童(n = 2447)以及居住在被随机分配作为对照的村庄中的儿童(n = 12,173)的死亡率进行了比较。在首次分发完成后的4个月内,学龄前接受胶囊的儿童的死亡率不到未接受者的4%(p < 0.001)。学龄前未接受者的死亡率是对照组的三倍(p < 0.05),这表明存在强烈的选择偏倚。据估计,维生素A补充剂对儿童死亡率的潜在生物学影响超过了先前从更保守的意向性分析得出的34%。每6个月服用一粒胶囊可能为绝大多数儿童提供足够的保护。实现最大影响的唯一主要限制似乎是项目覆盖范围不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验