• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显性遗传性肾发育异常。

Dominantly inherited renal adysplasia.

作者信息

McPherson E, Carey J, Kramer A, Hall J G, Pauli R M, Schimke R N, Tasin M H

出版信息

Am J Med Genet. 1987 Apr;26(4):863-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320260413.

DOI:10.1002/ajmg.1320260413
PMID:3591828
Abstract

We are reporting on 7 families with both unilateral and bilateral renal agenesis (or severe dysplasia). This condition, termed hereditary renal adysplasia (HRA) [Buchta et al, 1973], is an autosomal dominant trait with incomplete penetrance and variable expression. Review of the literature on familial renal agenesis suggests that HRA is more common than previously supposed and may account for most recurrences of bilateral renal agenesis (BRA), even when the parents are normal. There are no consistent phenotypic differences between sporadic and familial renal agenesis. Associated non-urogenital anomalies, although more frequent in sporadic cases, have been reported in HRA. Use of several approaches, including the Weinberg Proband Method, segregation analysis, and empiric risk estimation, leads to the conclusion that autosomal dominant inheritance is the most likely pattern of transmission for most cases of renal agenesis. Penetrance is between 50% and 90%. Ultrasound study of the kidneys of parents, sibs, and other relatives is recommended in all families in which there is an individual with unilateral or bilateral renal agenesis. The empiric risk for recurrence of BRA in sibs has been estimated at 3.5% [Carter, et al, 1979] but in the offspring of affected or obligate heterozygotes for HRA, the empiric risk of bilateral severe renal adysplasia is 15-20%.

摘要

我们报告了7个患有单侧和双侧肾缺如(或严重发育异常)的家庭。这种病症被称为遗传性肾发育异常(HRA)[布赫塔等人,1973年],是一种常染色体显性性状,具有不完全外显率和可变表达。对家族性肾缺如文献的回顾表明,HRA比以前认为的更为常见,并且可能是双侧肾缺如(BRA)大多数复发的原因,即使父母正常。散发性和家族性肾缺如之间没有一致的表型差异。虽然在散发性病例中更常见,但HRA中也有相关非泌尿生殖系统异常的报道。使用包括温伯格先证者法、分离分析和经验风险估计在内的几种方法,得出常染色体显性遗传是大多数肾缺如病例最可能的遗传模式的结论。外显率在50%至90%之间。对于所有有单侧或双侧肾缺如个体的家庭,建议对父母、同胞和其他亲属的肾脏进行超声检查。同胞中BRA复发的经验风险估计为3.5%[卡特等人,1979年],但对于HRA的受累或必然杂合子的后代,双侧严重肾发育异常的经验风险为15 - 20%。

相似文献

1
Dominantly inherited renal adysplasia.显性遗传性肾发育异常。
Am J Med Genet. 1987 Apr;26(4):863-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320260413.
2
[Familial kidney agenesis: renal adysplasia as a cause of urogenital abnormalities in 3 generations].[家族性肾发育不全:三代人中肾发育异常作为泌尿生殖系统异常的一个原因]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989 Aug;49(8):759-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036081.
3
Hereditary renal adysplasia in a three generations family.
Genet Couns. 1999;10(3):251-7.
4
[Hereditary renal agenesis . Report of a case].[遗传性肾缺如。一例报告]
Minerva Ginecol. 1998 Jun;50(6):255-9.
5
Management dilemmas in patients with hereditary renal adysplasia.遗传性肾发育不良患者的管理困境
J La State Med Soc. 2001 Jan;153(1):27-30.
6
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
7
The syndrome of anosmia with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a genetic study of 18 new families and a review.嗅觉缺失伴低促性腺激素性性腺功能减退综合征:18个新家族的遗传学研究及文献综述
Am J Med Genet. 1983 Jul;15(3):417-35. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320150307.
8
Bilateral renal agenesis in twins.双胞胎双侧肾缺如
Am J Med Genet. 1985 May;21(1):147-52, 167-9. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320210122.
9
Familial occurrence of hereditary renal adysplasia with müllerian anomalies.遗传性肾发育异常合并苗勒管异常的家族性发病情况。
Clin Genet. 1993 Jan;43(1):23-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1993.tb04420.x.
10
Familial renal adysplasia.家族性肾发育异常
Am J Kidney Dis. 1991 Oct;18(4):490-4. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80118-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary approaches for elucidating genetics and molecular pathogenesis of urinary tract malformations.多学科方法阐明尿路畸形的遗传学和分子发病机制。
Kidney Int. 2022 Mar;101(3):473-484. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
How do we counsel men with obstructive azoospermia due to CF mutations?-a review of treatment options and outcomes.我们如何为因囊性纤维化(CF)基因突变导致梗阻性无精子症的男性提供咨询?——治疗选择与结果综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1467-1478. doi: 10.21037/tau-19-681.
3
Genetics of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: The Current State of Play.
肾脏和尿路先天性异常的遗传学:现状
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Apr 11;18(4):796. doi: 10.3390/ijms18040796.
4
Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT.CAKUT 相关的遗传、环境和表观遗传因素。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015 Dec;11(12):720-31. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.140. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Mutations of the SLIT2-ROBO2 pathway genes SLIT2 and SRGAP1 confer risk for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.SLIT2-ROBO2信号通路基因SLIT2和SRGAP1的突变会增加患先天性肾和尿路异常的风险。
Hum Genet. 2015 Aug;134(8):905-16. doi: 10.1007/s00439-015-1570-5. Epub 2015 May 31.
6
Congenic strain differences of renal malformations in ACI/Mna rats by introgression of the chromosomal region of BUF/Mna rats containing Pur1.
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2013 Aug;75(3-4):251-4.
7
Mutations in 12 known dominant disease-causing genes clarify many congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.12个已知的显性致病基因中的突变阐明了许多肾脏和尿路的先天性异常。
Kidney Int. 2014 Jun;85(6):1429-33. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.508. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
8
Renal hypodysplasia associates with a WNT4 variant that causes aberrant canonical WNT signaling.肾脏发育不全与 WNT4 变异体相关,该变异体导致异常的经典 WNT 信号通路。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Mar;24(4):550-8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012010097. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
9
Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: a genetic disorder?肾脏和尿路先天性异常:一种遗传性疾病?
Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012:909083. doi: 10.1155/2012/909083. Epub 2012 May 20.
10
Bilateral renal agenesis/hypoplasia/dysplasia (BRAHD): postmortem analysis of 45 cases with breakpoint mapping of two de novo translocations.双侧肾发育不全/发育不良/发育不良(BRAHD):2 例新发易位断点定位的 45 例尸检分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 25;5(8):e12375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012375.