Suppr超能文献

力量类别是否能预测职业伤害后的重返工作岗位?

Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury?

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386, Dazhong 1st Rd., Zuoying Dist., Kaohsiung City, 813414, Taiwan (ROC).

Department of Occupational Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386, Dazhong 1st Rd., Zuoying Dist., Kaohsiung City, 813414, Taiwan (ROC).

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):1472. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Occupational accidents may lead laborers to lose their working capacities, affecting their physical and mental health. Occupational rehabilitation helps improve the ability of patients with occupational accidents and suggests appropriate jobs to avoid second injuries. This study aimed to identify whether any of the functional capacity evaluation (FCE) strength subtests predicted successful return to work.

METHODS

Data were collected of 84 patients receiving government-subsidized occupational rehabilitation between September 2016 and December 2018. A structured questionnaire was employed for pre- and post-training assessment, including basic information, information of the occupational accident, status of the laborer at the opening of the injury case, physical requirement for the job, and physical capacity. Eight subtests of strength were included in the physical capacity evaluation, i.e., carrying, lifting to several levels, power grip, and lateral pinch, to explore the association between the strength tests and return to work.

RESULTS

The unadjusted model showed that for every additional kilogram in bilateral carrying strength before work hardening training, the odds of successful return to work increased (crude odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.24, p = 0.027). After adjustment for basic demographic information and pre-accident physical functional elements of work, the odds of successful return to work increased (adjusted OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.04-1.54, p = 0.02) for every additional kilogram in the pre-training bilateral carrying strength. There were no statistically significant differences observed in the other seven subtests.

CONCLUSION

Through thorough evaluation and work hardening training provided in the occupational rehabilitation, patients' physical capacity can be understood and improved. However, a full evaluation of functional capacities is prolonged and time-consuming. This study provides evidence that pre-work-hardening bilateral carrying strength may be a promising predictor of return to work and we recommend to consider it as a prioritized test to assist in determining appropriate advice regarding return to work.

摘要

背景

职业事故可能导致劳动者丧失工作能力,影响其身心健康。职业康复有助于提高职业事故患者的能力,并为其推荐合适的工作以避免再次受伤。本研究旨在确定功能能力评估(FCE)中的哪些力量测试能够预测成功重返工作岗位。

方法

本研究收集了 2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受政府补贴职业康复的 84 名患者的数据。采用结构化问卷进行培训前后评估,包括基本信息、职业事故信息、受伤案件受理时劳动者状况、工作物理要求和身体能力。身体能力评估包括 8 项力量测试,即搬运、举升到多个高度、握力和侧捏,以探讨力量测试与重返工作之间的关系。

结果

未调整模型显示,在工作强化训练前,双侧搬运力量每增加 1 公斤,成功重返工作岗位的几率增加(未经调整的优势比[OR] = 1.12,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.01-1.24,p = 0.027)。在调整了基本人口统计学信息和事故前工作的身体功能元素后,在工作强化训练前,双侧搬运力量每增加 1 公斤,成功重返工作岗位的几率增加(调整后的 OR = 1.27,95% CI = 1.04-1.54,p = 0.02)。其他 7 项测试没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

通过在职业康复中进行全面的评估和工作强化训练,可以了解和提高患者的身体能力。然而,全面的功能能力评估既冗长又耗时。本研究提供的证据表明,工作强化训练前的双侧搬运力量可能是重返工作岗位的一个有前途的预测指标,我们建议将其作为一个优先测试,以协助确定重返工作岗位的适当建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e3d/9344704/393f2345ebab/12889_2022_13817_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury?
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):1472. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2.
3
[Social and professional effects of hip prosthetic replacment on people under 50 years of age].
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 1996 Dec;6(4):229-234. doi: 10.1007/BF03380088. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
An exploration of alternative methods for assessing return-to-work success following occupational injury.
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(11):914-24. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.824033. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
Predictive validity of a customized functional capacity evaluation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Jul;93(5):635-643. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01518-5. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Validation of the Readiness for Return-To-Work Scale in Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation in Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):332-345. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9721-2.
9
Outcomes of an interdisciplinary work rehabilitation program.
Work. 2019;64(3):507-514. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193012.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical influences of gait patterns on knee joint: Kinematic & EMG analysis.
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233593. eCollection 2020.
2
Maximizing Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review of Advanced Resistance Training Techniques and Methods.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 4;16(24):4897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244897.
3
Evaluating Return-to-work Ability Using Functional Capacity Evaluation.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 Aug;30(3):541-559. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2019.04.002.
6
Prognostic factors for return to work and resumption of other daily activities after traumatic hand injury.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Feb;44(2):203-207. doi: 10.1177/1753193418812645. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study.
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):222-236. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x.
8
Weight-shift ability significantly correlates with walking velocity in post-acute stroke patients.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Apr;232(4):361-370. doi: 10.1177/0954411918757814. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Factors associated with non-return to work in the severely injured victims 3 years after a road accident: A prospective study.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验