Suppr超能文献

麻醉患者书面信息中的“反安慰剂语言”。

Nocebo language in anaesthetic patient written information.

机构信息

Royal United Hospitals Bath, UK.

Department of Women's Anaesthesia, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2022 Oct;77(10):1113-1119. doi: 10.1111/anae.15824. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that how anaesthesia information is presented may influence patient treatment outcomes. We conducted an observational study of anaesthetic-based patient information leaflets across NHS Trusts in England for their nocebo terms vs. therapeutic terms, and how adverse effects were presented. In this study, 'nocebo' is wording that may predispose the patient to expect adverse events such as pain or nausea. Data were extracted and analysed for word frequency, weighted proportion and thematic analysis. In total, 42 patient information leaflets from 61 NHS Trusts were analysed. 'Pain' was the second most common word across the leaflets, median (IQR [range]) 0.82 (0.50-1.0 [0.12-1.47]) per 100 words, second only to 'anaesthesia'. In comparison, 'safe' was the most common positively valanced word which featured eight times less frequently than 'pain' 0.10 (0.07-0.18 [0.0-0.84]) and 'comfort' featured 16.5 times less than 'pain' 0.02 (0.0-0.05 [0.0-0.13]). Multiple examples of phrasing that could have potential nocebo effects included, 'you will need strong painkillers' suggesting 'strong pain' and the need for 'painkillers' rather than using therapeutic terms focusing on 'comfort', 'healing' and 'recovery'. Our results suggest a dominance of phrases with negative content in the presentation of anaesthesia information provided to patients. Clinicians need to be aware of inadvertent generation of nocebo-weighted vs. comfort-weighted communication with patients. Our study findings suggest an opportunity for more emphasis to be placed on therapeutic outcomes and effective mitigation strategies of anaesthesia risks to avoid potential unintended nocebo effects of anaesthesia information leaflets or websites.

摘要

最近的证据表明,麻醉信息的呈现方式可能会影响患者的治疗效果。我们对英格兰国民保健制度信托基金的麻醉患者信息传单进行了一项观察性研究,比较了它们的负面术语与治疗术语,以及它们如何呈现不良反应。在这项研究中,“负面暗示”是指可能使患者预期疼痛或恶心等不良事件的措辞。我们提取并分析了数据的词频、加权比例和主题分析。总共有 61 家国民保健制度信托基金的 42 份患者信息传单进行了分析。“疼痛”是传单中出现频率第二高的词汇,中位数(IQR[范围])为每 100 个单词中 0.82(0.50-1.0[0.12-1.47]),仅次于“麻醉”。相比之下,“安全”是出现频率最高的积极词汇,但出现频率比“疼痛”低 8 倍,为 0.10(0.07-0.18[0.0-0.84]),“舒适”比“疼痛”低 16.5 倍,为 0.02(0.0-0.05[0.0-0.13])。一些可能产生负面暗示效果的措辞示例包括,“你将需要强力止痛药”暗示“强烈的疼痛”和需要“止痛药”,而不是使用关注“舒适”、“愈合”和“康复”的治疗术语。我们的研究结果表明,在向患者提供的麻醉信息呈现中,负面内容的短语占主导地位。临床医生需要意识到与患者进行的沟通中,无意中产生了负面暗示与舒适暗示之间的权衡。我们的研究结果表明,有机会更加重视治疗结果和麻醉风险的有效缓解策略,以避免麻醉信息传单或网站可能产生的意外负面暗示效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验