Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性、随机、平行分组、双盲、多中心研究,旨在比较鲁宾的雷珠单抗与 Lucentis 在治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。

A prospective, randomized, parallel group, double blind, multicenter study to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of Lupin's Ranibizumab with Lucentis in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

机构信息

Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Vitreo Retinal Surgeon-Department of Ophthalmology, Rising Retina Clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;70(8):3008-3014. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2118_21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study compares the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of Lupin's biosimilar ranibizumab with that of Lucentis in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blind, multi-centric phase-III study was conducted across 19 centers in India. A total of 202 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were randomized (1:1) to receive either Lupin's biosimilar ranibizumab or Lucentis, 0.5 mg, as an intravitreous injection once every month for 3 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who lost fewer than 15 letters from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity. The safety profile included assessment of adverse events, ophthalmic examination, physical and systemic examination, and vital parameters. The immunogenicity assessment was based on evaluation of anti-drug antibodies.

RESULTS

Overall, 174 patients (87 [86.14%] in each group) completed the study. The demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups. The proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline best corrected visual acuity score in the study eye was comparable between two groups. The difference between Lupin's ranibizumab and Lucentis for the proportion of patients who lost fewer than 15 letters was within the predefined equivalence margin (intention-to-treat population: 1.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.3% to 5.4% and per protocol population: 1.2%; 95% CI, -3.2% to 6.4%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable, and 11 (10.89%) patients in Lupin's ranibizumab and 19 (18.81%) patients in Lucentis group had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The immunogenicity incidence as assessed by proportion of patients with positive anti-drug antibodies was numerically lower in Lupin's ranibizumab (4.95%) than Lucentis (12.87%).

CONCLUSION

Lupin's biosimilar ranibizumab demonstrated therapeutic equivalence, desirable safety, and favorable immunogenicity profile compared to Lucentis.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了鲁宾生物类似药雷珠单抗与 Lucentis 在治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。

方法

这是一项在印度 19 家中心进行的前瞻性、双盲、多中心 III 期研究。共 202 例新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者按 1:1 随机分为两组,分别接受鲁宾生物类似药雷珠单抗或 Lucentis(0.5mg)玻璃体腔内注射,每月 1 次,连续 3 个月。主要疗效终点为最佳矫正视力较基线丧失少于 15 个字母的患者比例。安全性评估包括不良事件、眼科检查、体格检查和系统检查以及生命体征的评估。免疫原性评估基于抗药物抗体的评估。

结果

共有 174 例患者(每组各 87 例)完成了研究。两组患者的人口统计学和基线特征具有可比性。研究眼最佳矫正视力较基线丧失少于 15 个字母的患者比例在两组间相似。鲁宾生物类似药雷珠单抗和 Lucentis 组患者丧失少于 15 个字母的比例差异在预先设定的等效性范围内(意向治疗人群:1.0%;95%置信区间[-3.3%,5.4%]和符合方案人群:1.2%;95%置信区间[-3.2%,6.4%])。治疗期间发生的不良事件发生率相似,鲁宾生物类似药雷珠单抗组 11 例(10.89%)和 Lucentis 组 19 例(18.81%)患者至少发生 1 例治疗期间出现的不良事件。通过抗药物抗体阳性患者的比例评估免疫原性发生率,鲁宾生物类似药雷珠单抗组(4.95%)略低于 Lucentis 组(12.87%)。

结论

与 Lucentis 相比,鲁宾生物类似药雷珠单抗显示出治疗等效性、良好的安全性和有利的免疫原性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ab/9672715/5fdf214d9e6d/IJO-70-3008-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验