Farhoudi Ilnaz, Parsay Soheil
Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Private Practice, Ardabil, Iran.
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2018 Jun 20;10(1):24-28. doi: 10.15171/japid.2018.005. eCollection 2018.
The effect of keratinized tissue width on the peri-implant health has not been well elucidated. The results of previous studies on this topic are controversial and the role of keratinized tissue width in the long-term success of dental implants has not been confirmed. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the correlation of keratinized tissue width with periodontal indices around implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs).
This cross-sectional study evaluated 73 implants. Patients underwent periodontal examinations, including measurement of plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), clinical probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), marginal gingival recession, keratinized mucosa width and radiographic marginal bone level. Data were analyzed using SPSS.
The mean GI, PI and marginal gingival recession around implants with <2 mm width of keratinized gingiva were greater than the corresponding values around implants with keratinized tissue width of ≥2 mm. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). No significant differences were noted in PD and radiographic marginal bone level between the two implant groups with keratinized tissue width <2 mm and ≥2 mm. Thus, no correlation was found between the keratinized tissue width and the measured indices.
Although this study did not show a significant correlation between the keratinized tissue width and peri-implant tissue health and consequently the implant success rate, long-term interventional studies are required to make a final judgment in this respect.
角化组织宽度对种植体周围健康的影响尚未得到充分阐明。以往关于该主题的研究结果存在争议,角化组织宽度在牙种植体长期成功中的作用尚未得到证实。这项横断面研究旨在评估角化组织宽度与种植体支持的固定局部义齿(FPD)周围牙周指数的相关性。
这项横断面研究评估了73颗种植体。患者接受了牙周检查,包括菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、临床探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)、边缘牙龈退缩、角化黏膜宽度和影像学边缘骨水平的测量。使用SPSS对数据进行分析。
角化牙龈宽度<2mm的种植体周围的平均GI、PI和边缘牙龈退缩大于角化组织宽度≥2mm的种植体周围的相应值。然而,这种差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。角化组织宽度<2mm和≥2mm的两组种植体之间在PD和影像学边缘骨水平上未发现显著差异。因此,未发现角化组织宽度与所测量指标之间存在相关性。
尽管本研究未显示角化组织宽度与种植体周围组织健康以及种植体成功率之间存在显著相关性,但仍需要进行长期干预研究以在这方面做出最终判断。