• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险因素对超窄种植体口腔修复长期存活率的影响:一项回顾性研究。

Influence of risk factors on the long-term survival of oral rehabilitation with extra-narrow implants: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Faculdade Ilapeo, Curitiba, Brasil.

Neodent, Curitiba, Brasil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2022 Aug 1;30:e20220089. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0089. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0089
PMID:35920448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9365337/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to retrospectively collect clinical data to evaluate the influence of possible risk factors on the long-term success of implant treatment with extra-narrow (2.9 mm diameter) implants in a daily dental practice setting.

METHODOLOGY

Data were collected from records of patients who received at least one extra-narrow implant from 2012 to 2017, regarding implant survival, prosthesis survival, patient characteristics, and implant characteristics. The association between the dependent variables "implant survival", "prosthesis survival," and "adverse events" related to patient and implant characteristics was statistically evaluated by chi-square tests. Moreover, implant and prosthesis survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

The sample was constituted of 58 patients (37 women and 21 men) with a mean age of 54.8 years old (SD: 12.5), followed up for up to eight years. In total, 86 extra-narrow implants were placed within this sample. Four implants were lost, resulting in an implant survival rate of 95.3%. A total of 55 prostheses were inserted and only one (1.8%) was lost, resulting in a prosthesis survival rate of 98.2%. The mean implant and prosthesis survival time was, respectively, 7.1 years and 6.3 years, according to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A correlation was found between smoking and implant loss, which makes implant loss eight times more likely to occur in smokers than non-smokers. A significant association was also found between prosthesis loss and previous need of prosthesis repair. However, it was not considered clinically relevant. No association was found between the occurrence of adverse events and later implant or prosthesis loss.

CONCLUSION

High implant and prosthesis survival rates were found in the long term for treatment with extra-narrow implants. Moreover, a significant correlation between smoking and implant loss was observed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性收集临床数据,评估在日常牙科实践中,额外狭窄(直径 2.9 毫米)种植体的长期成功与可能的风险因素的关系。

方法

从 2012 年至 2017 年期间接受至少一个额外狭窄种植体的患者记录中收集数据,包括种植体存活率、修复体存活率、患者特征和种植体特征。通过卡方检验对与患者和种植体特征相关的依赖变量“种植体存活率”、“修复体存活率”和“不良事件”之间的关系进行统计学评估。此外,通过 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线分析种植体和修复体的存活率。

结果

样本由 58 名患者(37 名女性和 21 名男性)组成,平均年龄为 54.8 岁(标准差:12.5),随访时间最长达 8 年。总共有 86 个额外狭窄种植体被植入该样本中。有 4 个种植体脱落,种植体存活率为 95.3%。共插入 55 个修复体,其中只有 1 个(1.8%)脱落,修复体存活率为 98.2%。根据 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析,种植体和修复体的平均存活时间分别为 7.1 年和 6.3 年。发现吸烟与种植体脱落之间存在相关性,吸烟者种植体脱落的可能性是非吸烟者的 8 倍。修复体脱落与之前需要修复体修复之间也存在显著相关性,但未被认为具有临床意义。不良事件的发生与后期种植体或修复体脱落之间未发现关联。

结论

长期使用额外狭窄种植体治疗可获得较高的种植体和修复体存活率。此外,还观察到吸烟与种植体脱落之间存在显著相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/fe9f723be0eb/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/8ac80f801e8c/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/d6a9459ae9f4/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/fe9f723be0eb/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/8ac80f801e8c/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/d6a9459ae9f4/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4b/9365337/fe9f723be0eb/1678-7757-jaos-30-e20220089-gf03.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of risk factors on the long-term survival of oral rehabilitation with extra-narrow implants: a retrospective study.风险因素对超窄种植体口腔修复长期存活率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2022 Aug 1;30:e20220089. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0089. eCollection 2022.
2
Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 174 implants with different variables associated over a minimum observational period of 20 years: A retrospective study.在至少 20 年的观察期内,对 174 个与不同变量相关的种植体的种植体存活率和边缘骨吸收情况进行回顾性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Oct;33(8):764-773. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13848. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.316 种窄径种植体 5-10 年的随访评估:一项临床和放射学回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):296-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01840.x.
4
Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss.后牙区短种植体和超短种植体的回顾性研究:冠根比对边缘骨吸收的影响
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):102-10. doi: 10.1111/cid.12073. Epub 2013 May 8.
5
Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary.一项关于采用上颌外植入即刻负重颧骨种植体修复完全无牙萎缩性上颌骨的回顾性队列研究的五年随访结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):267-81.
6
Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants.即刻负重的种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿:对328颗种植体进行的3至8年前瞻性研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00179.x.
7
Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study.大骨缺损患者种植体的成功及种植体失败的风险因素分析:一项非随机回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2743-2750. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04249-0. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Factors influencing implant and prosthesis survival in zygomatic implant-supported fixed rehabilitation: a retrospective study.影响颧骨种植体支持固定修复体植入物和修复体存活率的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Odontology. 2021 Oct;109(4):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00621-4. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
Epidemiology of Implant Mortality Disparity Among Intraoral Positions and Prosthesis Types.口腔内不同位置及修复体类型的种植体死亡率差异的流行病学研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):525-532. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5044.
10
Ten-year follow-up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study.十年随访即刻负载在下颌无牙颌中使用的牙种植体:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):515-521. doi: 10.1111/cid.12612. Epub 2018 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding success: A five-year retrospective study of dental Implant survival.解读成功:一项关于牙种植体存留率的五年回顾性研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):948-954. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.021. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Narrow-diameter implants for treatment with fixed restorations in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于后牙区固定修复治疗的窄直径种植体:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Aug;34(7):670-685. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14057. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
3
Long-term clinical study of fixed prosthetic rehabilitation using one-piece narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing implant and prosthesis survival in zygomatic implant-supported fixed rehabilitation: a retrospective study.影响颧骨种植体支持固定修复体植入物和修复体存活率的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Odontology. 2021 Oct;109(4):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00621-4. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
2
Medium- and Long-Term Survival Rates of Implant-Supported Single and Partial Restorations at a Maximum Follow-up of 12 Years: A Retrospective Study.种植体支持的单牙和部分修复体的 12 年长期生存率:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Mar-Apr;34(2):183-191. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6883.
3
Levels of smoking and dental implants failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
使用一体式窄直径种植体进行固定义齿修复的长期临床研究:一项回顾性研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Dec 31;50(6):343-349. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.6.343.
4
The Effects of Smoking on Dental Implant Failure: A Current Literature Update.吸烟对牙种植失败的影响:当前文献综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;12(10):311. doi: 10.3390/dj12100311.
5
The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.窄径种植体与标准径种植体生存率的比较:一项更新的Meta分析。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Feb 9;37:5. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.5. eCollection 2023.
吸烟与牙种植体失败的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Apr;47(4):518-528. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13257. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region.上颌前区窄径种植体失败的风险因素和再次手术生存率。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Feb;22(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/cid.12867. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis.窄直径种植体与常规直径种植体的临床性能:一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Dec;45(6):503-508. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00025. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Frequency of adequate mesiodistal space and faciolingual alveolar width for implant placement at anterior tooth positions.前牙部位种植体植入所需的足够近远中向牙槽骨宽度和颊舌向牙槽骨宽度。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Sep;150(9):779-787. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.05.003.
7
Clinical, radiographic, and restorative peri-implant measurements of narrow and standard diameter implants in obese and nonobese patients: A 3-year retrospective follow-up study.肥胖与非肥胖患者中窄直径和标准直径种植体的临床、放射影像学和修复体相关种植体周指标:一项为期 3 年的回顾性随访研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):656-661. doi: 10.1111/cid.12798. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
The Effects of Systemic Diseases and Medications on Implant Osseointegration: A Systematic Review.系统性疾病和药物对种植体骨整合的影响:系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:s35-s49. doi: 10.11607/jomi.19suppl.g3.
9
Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.窄直径种植体:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:21-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.13272.
10
Extra-short (< 7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (< 3.5 mm) implants: a meta-analytic literature review.超短(<7毫米)和超窄直径(<3.5毫米)种植体:一项荟萃分析文献综述
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11 Suppl 1:S137-S146.