MSc. Physical Education Professional, Postgraduate Student in Physical Education, Department of Sports Sciences, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba (MG), Brazil.
PhD. Physical Education Professional, Associate Professor and Coordinator, Postgraduate Course in Physical Education, Department of Sports Sciences, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba (MG), Brazil.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2023 Jan-Feb;141(1):12-19. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0420.R3.03032022.
Frailty syndrome is associated with various physical, cognitive, social, economic, and environmental factors. Although frailty syndrome occurs progressively with age, prevention and treatment are possible. Reducing or eliminating risks and increasing protective factors may be potential strategies for reducing the prevalence of injuries related to frailty. One of the most effective actions is to decrease the time spent in sedentary behavior (SB) by increasing regular physical activity (PA).
To examine the hypothetical effect of substitution of the time spent in sleep or SB with an equivalent time spent performing moderate or vigorous PA on frailty syndrome in the older population.
An analytical cross-sectional study conducted using exploratory methods of survey, carried out in Alcobaça city, Bahia, Brazil.
A total of 456 older adults of both sexes, aged ≥ 60 years, participated in this study. Frailty syndrome was identified according to the criteria of the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. PA and SB were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and sleep was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The effects of time substitution on these behaviors were verified using Poisson regression.
The replacement of 60 min/day of SB (prevalence ratio, PR = 0.52; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.28-0.96) or sleep (PR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.27-0.98) with 60 min/day of moderate PA (MPA) was associated with a 48% reduction in the prevalence of frailty syndrome.
Replacing the time spent sitting or sleeping with the same amount of MPA time may reduce frailty; the longer the duration of time spent in the substitution of sleep or SB with MPA, the greater the benefits.
衰弱综合征与各种身体、认知、社会、经济和环境因素有关。尽管衰弱综合征随着年龄的增长而逐渐发生,但可以预防和治疗。减少或消除风险并增加保护因素可能是减少与衰弱相关损伤患病率的潜在策略。其中最有效的措施之一是通过增加有规律的体力活动来减少久坐行为(SB)的时间。
研究用相当于睡眠或 SB 的时间来替代进行中等到剧烈体力活动(PA)对老年人群衰弱综合征的假设影响。
这是一项在巴西巴伊亚州阿尔科巴萨市进行的横断面研究,采用探索性调查方法。
共有 456 名年龄在 60 岁及以上的男女老年人参与了这项研究。根据骨质疏松性骨折研究的标准来确定衰弱综合征。使用国际体力活动问卷评估 PA 和 SB,使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评估睡眠。使用泊松回归来验证这些行为的时间替代效应。
每天替代 60 分钟 SB(患病率比,PR=0.52;95%置信区间,CI:0.28-0.96)或睡眠(PR=0.52;95% CI:0.27-0.98)与每天 60 分钟中等 PA(MPA)的替代与衰弱综合征患病率降低 48%相关。
用同样数量的 MPA 时间替代坐或睡的时间可能会降低衰弱的风险;用 MPA 替代睡眠或 SB 的时间越长,获益越大。