• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经假体强化腹壁再次手术及其与术后结局和纵向医疗保健利用的关系。

Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization.

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):908-916. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3320.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3320
PMID:35921101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9350843/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Prosthetic reinforcement of critically sized incisional hernias is necessary to decrease hernia recurrence, but long-term prosthetic-mesh footprint may increase complication risk during subsequent abdominal operations.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of prior incisional hernia repair with mesh (IHRWM) with postoperative outcomes and health care utilization after common abdominal operations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing inpatient abdominal surgical procedures during the period of January 2009 to December 2016, with at least 1 year of follow-up within 5 geographically diverse statewide inpatient/ambulatory databases (Florida, Iowa, Nebraska, New York, Utah). History of an abdominal operation was ascertained within the 3-year period preceding the index operation. Patients admitted to the hospital with a history of an abdominal operation (ie, bariatric, cholecystectomy, small- or large-bowel resection, prostatectomy, gynecologic) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Patients with prior IHRWM were propensity score matched (1:1) to controls both with and without a history of an abdominal surgical procedure based on clinical and operative characteristics. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to November 27, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a composite of adverse postoperative outcomes (surgical and nonsurgical). Secondary outcomes included health care utilization determined by length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and 1-year readmissions. Logistic and Cox regression determined the association of prior IHRWM with the outcomes of interest. Additional subanalyses matched and compared patients with prior IHR without mesh (IHRWOM) to those with a history of an abdominal operation.

RESULTS

Of the 914 105 patients undergoing common abdominal surgical procedures (81 123 bariatric [8.9%], 284 450 small- or large-bowel resection [31.1%], 223 768 cholecystectomy [24.5%], 33 183 prostatectomy [3.6%], and 291 581 gynecologic [31.9%]), all 3517 patients (age group: 46-55 years, 1547 [44.0%]; 2396 majority sex [68.1%]) with prior IHRWM were matched to patients without a history of abdominal surgical procedures. After matching, prior IHRWM was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60), surgical complications (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.70), length of hospital stay (mean increase of 1.03 days; 95% CI, 0.56-1.49 days; P < .001), index admission charges (predicted mean difference of $11 896.10; 95% CI, $6096.80-$17 695.40; P < .001), and 1-year unplanned readmissions (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002). This trend persisted even when comparing matched patients with prior IHRWM to patients with a history of abdominal surgical procedures, and the treatment outcome disappeared when comparing patients with prior IHRWOM to those without a previous abdominal operation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Reoperation through a previously prosthetic-reinforced abdominal wall was associated with increased surgical complications and health care utilization. This risk appeared to be independent of a history of abdominal surgical procedures and was magnified by the presence of a prosthetic-mesh footprint in the abdominal wall.

摘要

重要性

为了降低疝复发的风险,临界尺寸切口疝的修补需要进行假体强化,但在随后的腹部手术中,长期假体网片的足迹可能会增加并发症的风险。

目的

研究既往切口疝修补术(IHRWM)与常见腹部手术后的术后结果和医疗保健利用之间的关系。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间接受住院腹部手术的患者,在 5 个地理位置不同的全州住院/门诊数据库(佛罗里达州、爱荷华州、内布拉斯加州、纽约州、犹他州)中至少有 1 年的随访。在索引手术前的 3 年内确定腹部手术史。使用国际疾病分类第 9 版和第 10 版临床修正手术代码,确定因腹部手术(即减重手术、胆囊切除术、小肠或大肠切除术、前列腺切除术、妇科手术)而住院的患者。根据临床和手术特征,对有或无腹部手术史的患者,将既往有 IHRWM 的患者与对照组进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配。数据分析于 2021 年 3 月 1 日至 11 月 27 日进行。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是不良术后结局(手术和非手术)的综合指标。次要结果包括通过住院时间、住院费用和 1 年再入院率确定的医疗保健利用率。使用逻辑和 Cox 回归确定既往 IHRWM 与感兴趣的结果之间的关系。额外的亚分析将既往有 IHRWM 但无网片(IHRWOM)的患者与有腹部手术史的患者进行匹配和比较。

结果

在接受常见腹部手术的 914105 例患者中(81123 例减重手术[8.9%]、284450 例小肠或大肠切除术[31.1%]、223768 例胆囊切除术[24.5%]、33183 例前列腺切除术[3.6%]和 291581 例妇科手术[31.9%]),所有 3517 例(年龄组:46-55 岁,1547 例[44.0%];2396 例多数为男性[68.1%])既往有 IHRWM 的患者均与无腹部手术史的患者进行了匹配。匹配后,既往 IHRWM 与总并发症(比值比[OR],1.43;95%置信区间[CI],1.27-1.60)、手术并发症(OR,1.51;95% CI,1.34-1.70)、住院时间(平均增加 1.03 天;95% CI,0.56-1.49 天;P <.001)、指数入院费用(预测平均差值 11896.10 美元;95% CI,6096.80-17695.40 美元;P <.001)和 1 年无计划再入院(风险比,1.14;95% CI,1.05-1.25;P =.002)有关。即使将匹配的既往有 IHRWM 的患者与有腹部手术史的患者进行比较,这种趋势仍然存在,而当将既往有 IHRWOM 的患者与无腹部手术史的患者进行比较时,治疗结果则消失。

结论和相关性

通过先前假体强化的腹壁再次手术与手术并发症和医疗保健利用增加有关。这种风险似乎独立于腹部手术史,并且在腹壁存在假体网片足迹时会放大。

相似文献

1
Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization.经假体强化腹壁再次手术及其与术后结局和纵向医疗保健利用的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):908-916. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3320.
2
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后再次腹部手术的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):823-828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
5
Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.与桥接生物补片修复腹壁重建相比,采用生物补片加强的一期筋膜闭合术并发症和复发率更低:一项倾向评分分析。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
6
Ten-year outcomes following ventral hernia repair: making the case for better post-market surveillance in the USA.腹外疝修补术后 10 年的结果:呼吁更好地进行美国上市后监测。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5612-5622. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09725-6. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up-a prospective, consecutive cohort study.双层自体真皮瓣在复发性和/或感染性切口疝治疗中的应用:手术技术介绍及1年随访结果——一项前瞻性连续队列研究
Hernia. 2016 Jun;20(3):461-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1442-x. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis.随着时间的推移,切口疝修补术的疗效是否有所改善?一项基于人群的分析。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):129-35. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00018.
9
Incidence, Burden on the Health Care System, and Factors Associated With Incisional Hernia After Trauma Laparotomy.创伤性剖腹手术后切口疝的发生率、对医疗保健系统的负担及相关因素。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Sep 1;156(9):e213104. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3104. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
10
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Correspondence: short-term outcomes of robotic eTEP versus TAPP for ventral hernia repair: insights from a propensity-matched cohort.通信:机器人辅助内镜下经腹膜前修补术(eTEP)与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗腹疝的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究的见解
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 11;19(1):372. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02565-1.
2
Development and Validation of a Risk Predictive Model for Adverse Postoperative Health Status of Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery Using Lasso-Logistic Regression.使用套索逻辑回归开发并验证老年患者接受腹部大手术后不良健康状况的风险预测模型
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Feb 25;20:183-196. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S511982. eCollection 2025.
3
Nature-derived microneedles with metal-polyphenolic networks encapsulation for chronic soft tissue defects repair: Responding and remodeling the regenerative microenvironment.用于慢性软组织缺损修复的具有金属多酚网络封装的天然衍生微针:响应和重塑再生微环境
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Feb 1;31:101539. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101539. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Early wound morbidity and clinical outcomes associated with P4HB mesh compared to permanent synthetic mesh in umbilical and small to medium, routine ventral hernia repairs.在脐疝以及中小型常规腹正中疝修补术中,与永久性合成补片相比,P4HB补片相关的早期伤口发病率及临床结局。
Front Surg. 2023 Oct 10;10:1280991. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1280991. eCollection 2023.