Michaeli Daniel Tobias, Michaeli Thomas
Fifth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4095-4106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00535. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
Clinical trial evidence is routinely evaluated for initial drug approvals, yet the benefit of indication extensions remains uncertain. This study evaluates the clinical benefit supporting new cancer drugs' initial and supplemental US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indication approval.
Clinical trial evidence supporting each indication's FDA approval was collected from the Drugs@FDA database between 2003 and 2021. Drug, indication, and clinical trial characteristics are described. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and relative risk for tumor response were meta-analyzed.
Out of 124 FDA-approved drugs, 78 were approved across multiple indications. Out of 374 indications, 141 were approved as combination therapies, 255 for solid cancers, 121 with biomarkers, and 182 as first-line therapy. Approval was mostly supported by open-label (267 [71%]) phase III (238 [64%]) concurrent randomized controlled trials (248 [66%]) with a median of 331 enrolled patients (interquartile range [IQR], 123-665 patients). Across 234 randomized controlled trials with available data, drugs' HRs were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.75; = 29.6%) for OS and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.60; = 90.6%) for PFS, whereas tumor response was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.33 to 1.42; = 80.7%). Novel pharmaceuticals increased patient survival by a median of 2.80 months (IQR, 1.97-4.60 months) for OS and 3.30 months (IQR, 1.50-5.58 months) for PFS. Initial indications more frequently received accelerated approval, supported by single-arm trials for advanced-line monotherapies, than indication extensions. Initial approvals provided a higher PFS (HR, 0.48 0.58; = .002) and tumor response (relative risk, 1.76 1.36; < .001).
New cancer drugs substantially reduce the risk of death and tumor progression, yet only marginally extend patient survival. The FDA, physicians, patients, and insurers must evaluate and decide on a drug's safety and efficacy approval, pricing, coverage, and reimbursement on an level.
临床试验证据通常用于药物初始批准的评估,但适应证扩展的益处仍不明确。本研究评估支持美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准新癌症药物初始及补充适应证的临床获益。
从2003年至2021年的Drugs@FDA数据库中收集支持FDA批准各适应证的临床试验证据。描述药物、适应证及临床试验特征。对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(HRs)及肿瘤缓解的相对风险进行荟萃分析。
在124种获FDA批准的药物中,78种被批准用于多种适应证。在374个适应证中,141个被批准为联合治疗,255个用于实体癌,121个有生物标志物,182个作为一线治疗。批准大多得到开放标签(267项[71%])Ⅲ期(238项[64%])同期随机对照试验(248项[66%])的支持,入组患者中位数为331例(四分位间距[IQR],123 - 665例患者)。在234项有可用数据的随机对照试验中,药物的OS风险比为0.73(95%CI,0.72至0.75;P = 29.6%),PFS风险比为0.57(95%CI,0.54至0.60;P = 90.6%),而肿瘤缓解的相对风险为1.38(95%CI,1.33至1.42;P = 80.7%)。新型药物使患者的OS中位数增加2.80个月(IQR,1.97 - 4.60个月),PFS中位数增加3.30个月(IQR,1.50 - 5.58个月)。初始适应证比适应证扩展更频繁地获得加速批准,后者由晚期单药治疗的单臂试验支持。初始批准提供了更高的PFS(HR,0.48对0.58;P = 0.002)和肿瘤缓解(相对风险,1.76对1.36;P < 0.001)。
新癌症药物大幅降低死亡和肿瘤进展风险,但仅略微延长患者生存期。FDA、医生、患者及保险公司必须在个体层面评估并决定药物的安全性、疗效批准、定价、覆盖范围及报销事宜。