Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, United Kingdom.
Psychology in Education Research Centre, Department of Education, University of York, United Kingdom.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):2978-2995. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00610. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
The aim of this study was to identify variability in word-learning mechanisms used by late-talking children using a longitudinal study design, which may explain variability in late-talking children's outcomes.
A cohort of typically developing children ( = 40) and children who were classified as late-talking children at age 2;0 (years;months; ≤ 10th percentile on expressive vocabulary, = 21) were followed up at ages 3;0 and 3;6. We tested the cohort across tasks designed to isolate different mechanisms involved in word learning: encoding and producing spoken forms of words (using a nonword repetition task), identifying referents for words (using a fast mapping task), and learning associations between words and referents (using a cross-situational word-learning task).
Late-talking children had lower accuracy on nonword repetition than typically developing children, despite most of the sample reaching typical ranges for expressive vocabulary at age 3;6. There were no between-groups differences in fast mapping and retention accuracy; however, both were predicted by concurrent expressive vocabulary. Late-talking children performed less accurately than typically developing children on cross-situational word-learning retention trials, despite showing no between-groups differences during training trials. Combining performance across all three tasks predicted approximately 45% of the variance in vocabulary outcomes at the last time point.
Late-talking children continue to have deficits in phonological representation that impact their word-learning ability and expressive language abilities but do not show difficulties in fast mapping novel words. Late-talking children may also struggle to retain associative information about word-referent mappings. Late-talking children thus use some, but not all, word-learning mechanisms differently than typically developing children.
本研究旨在通过纵向研究设计,确定晚说话儿童使用的词汇学习机制的变异性,这可能解释了晚说话儿童结果的变异性。
一个典型发育的儿童队列(n=40)和在 2;0 岁时被归类为晚说话儿童的儿童(表达词汇量≤第 10 百分位数,n=21)在 3;0 岁和 3;6 岁时进行了随访。我们通过一系列任务来测试队列,这些任务旨在分离词汇学习中涉及的不同机制:(1) 对单词的口头形式进行编码和产生(使用非单词重复任务);(2) 识别单词的指代对象(使用快速映射任务);(3) 学习单词和指代对象之间的关联(使用跨情境词汇学习任务)。
尽管大多数样本在 3;6 岁时达到了表达词汇量的典型范围,但晚说话儿童在非单词重复任务上的准确率低于典型发育儿童。组间在快速映射和保留准确性上没有差异;然而,两者都与同期的表达词汇量相关。尽管在训练阶段晚说话儿童和典型发育儿童在跨情境词汇学习保留试验中的表现没有差异,但晚说话儿童的准确率较低。在所有三个任务中的表现相结合,大约可以预测词汇量结果的 45%在最后一个时间点。
晚说话儿童在语音表达方面仍存在缺陷,这影响了他们的词汇学习能力和表达语言能力,但在快速映射新单词方面没有困难。晚说话儿童可能也难以保留有关单词与指代对象映射的联想信息。因此,晚说话儿童在使用某些词汇学习机制方面与典型发育儿童不同,但并非所有机制都不同。