Danielle M. Harris is Senior Program Manager, Kate Morrison is Program Manager, and Shannon Bledsoe is Executive Director, Catalyst Global, Carlsbad, CA, United States.
Anita Dam is Technical Advisor for the Introduction & Access of HIV Prevention Technologies, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Global Health Technical Professionals Program, Washington, DC, USA.
Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Sep;53(3):455-490. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12209. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
Most vaginally inserted methods have limited availability and use despite offering characteristics that align with many women's stated preferences (e.g., nonhormonal and/or on demand). The objective of this review was to identify enablers and barriers to women's adoption and continuation of vaginally inserted contraceptive methods in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) and 18 websites using keywords related to five vaginally inserted contraceptive methods (diaphragm, vaginal ring, female condom, copper intrauterine device [IUD], hormonal IUD) and terms associated with their adoption and continuation. Searches were limited to resources published between January 2010 and September 2020. Studies eligible for inclusion in our review presented results on women's use and perspectives on the enablers and barriers to adoption and continuation of the vaginally inserted contraceptive methods of interest in LMICs. Relevant studies among women's partners were also included, but not those of providers or other stakeholders. Data were coded, analyzed, and disaggregated according to a framework grounded in family planning (FP) literature and behavioral theories common to FP research and program implementation. Our initial search yielded 13,848 results, with 182 studies ultimately included in the analysis. Across methods, we found common enablers for method adoption, including quality contraceptive counseling as well as alignment between a woman's preferences and a method's duration of use and side effect profile. Common barriers included a lack of familiarity with the methods and product cost. Notably, vaginal insertion was not a major barrier to adoption in the literature reviewed. Vaginally inserted methods of contraception have the potential to fill a gap in method offerings and expand choice. Programmatic actions should address key barriers and enable voluntary use.
大多数阴道插入式避孕方法的可及性和使用率有限,尽管它们具有与许多女性所表达的偏好相一致的特点(例如,非激素和/或按需)。本研究的目的是确定在中低收入国家(LMICs)中,女性采用和继续使用阴道插入式避孕方法的促进因素和障碍。我们在三个数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science)和 18 个网站上进行了搜索,使用了与五种阴道插入式避孕方法(隔膜、阴道环、女用避孕套、铜宫内节育器[IUD]、激素宫内节育器)及其采用和持续相关的关键词以及与它们的采用和持续相关的术语。搜索范围限于 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间发表的资源。本研究纳入的研究报告了女性对感兴趣的阴道插入式避孕方法的使用情况以及对采用和持续使用的促进因素和障碍的看法。还纳入了女性伴侣的相关研究,但不包括提供者或其他利益相关者的研究。根据以计划生育(FP)文献为基础的框架和 FP 研究和实施中常见的行为理论对数据进行了编码、分析和分类。我们最初的搜索产生了 13848 个结果,最终有 182 项研究纳入了分析。在所有方法中,我们发现了方法采用的共同促进因素,包括高质量的避孕咨询以及女性的偏好与方法的使用期限和副作用特征之间的一致性。常见的障碍包括对这些方法和产品成本缺乏了解。值得注意的是,在综述的文献中,阴道插入并不是采用的主要障碍。阴道插入式避孕方法有可能填补方法提供方面的空白,并扩大选择范围。方案行动应解决关键障碍,促进自愿使用。