• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症的神经代谢变化:芬戈莫德与β干扰素或那他珠单抗治疗的比较。

Neurometabolic changes in multiple sclerosis: Fingolimod versus beta interferon or glatiramer acetate therapy.

机构信息

School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 2022 Nov;32(6):1109-1120. doi: 10.1111/jon.13032. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/jon.13032
PMID:35922880
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Fingolimod has been shown to be more effective in reducing relapse rate and disability than injectable therapies in clinical trials. An increase in N-acetylaspartate (NAA) as measured by MR spectroscopy is correlated with maintaining axonal metabolic functions. This study compared the neurometabolic and volumetric changes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients on fingolimod or injectable therapies with healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

Ninety-eight RRMS (52 on fingolimod, 46 on injectable therapies (27 on glatiramer acetate and 19 on interferon) were age and sex-matched to 51 HCs. RRMS patients underwent cognitive, fatigue, and mental health assessments, as well as an Expanded disability status scale (EDSS). MRI/S was acquired from the hippocampus, posterior cingulate gyrus (PCG), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Volumetric and neurometabolic measures were compared across cohorts using a univariate general linear model and correlated with clinical severity and neuropsychological scores.

RESULTS

Clinical parameters, MR-volumetric, and neurometabolic profiles showed no differences between treatment groups (p > .05). Compared to HCs, both RRMS cohorts showed volume changes in white matter (-13%), gray matter (-16%), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) (+17-23%), as well as reduced NAA (-17%, p = .001, hippocampus), (-7%, p = .001, PCG), and (-9%, p = .001, PFC). MRI/S metrics in three regions were moderately correlated with cognition and fatigue functions.

CONCLUSION

While both treatment arms showed overall similar volumetric and neurometabolic profiles, longitudinal studies are warranted to clarify neurometabolic changes and associations with treatment efficacy.

摘要

背景与目的

在临床试验中,与注射疗法相比,芬戈莫德在降低复发率和残疾率方面更有效。磁共振波谱测量的 N-乙酰天门冬氨酸(NAA)增加与维持轴突代谢功能有关。本研究比较了接受芬戈莫德或注射疗法(27 例接受那他珠单抗,19 例接受干扰素)的复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者与健康对照者(HCs)的神经代谢和容积变化。

方法

98 例 RRMS(52 例接受芬戈莫德治疗,46 例接受注射治疗)与 51 例 HCs 按年龄和性别匹配。RRMS 患者接受认知、疲劳和心理健康评估,以及扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)评估。从海马体、后扣带回(PCG)和前额叶皮质(PFC)采集 MRI/S。使用单变量一般线性模型比较各组的容积和神经代谢测量值,并与临床严重程度和神经心理学评分相关。

结果

临床参数、MR 容积和神经代谢特征在治疗组之间无差异(p>.05)。与 HCs 相比,两组 RRMS 患者的脑白质(-13%)、灰质(-16%)和脑脊液(CSF)(+17-23%)容积均发生变化,且 NAA 减少(-17%,p=.001,海马体)、(-7%,p=.001,PCG)和(-9%,p=.001,PFC)。三个区域的 MRI/S 指标与认知和疲劳功能中度相关。

结论

虽然两种治疗方法的总体容积和神经代谢特征相似,但需要进行纵向研究以阐明神经代谢变化及其与治疗效果的关系。

相似文献

1
Neurometabolic changes in multiple sclerosis: Fingolimod versus beta interferon or glatiramer acetate therapy.多发性硬化症的神经代谢变化:芬戈莫德与β干扰素或那他珠单抗治疗的比较。
J Neuroimaging. 2022 Nov;32(6):1109-1120. doi: 10.1111/jon.13032. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
2
Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis.那他利珠单抗停药后,芬戈莫德对比干扰素β/那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的疗效。
Brain. 2015 Nov;138(Pt 11):3275-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv260. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
3
Treatment retention on fingolimod compared with injectable multiple sclerosis therapies in African-American patients: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 4 study.在非裔美国患者中,与注射用多发性硬化症治疗药物相比,芬戈莫德的治疗保留率:一项随机 4 期研究的亚组分析。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗一线注射治疗应答不佳的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650736. Epub 2016 May 26.
5
Impact of a switch to fingolimod versus staying on glatiramer acetate or beta interferons on patient- and physician-reported outcomes in relapsing multiple sclerosis: post hoc analyses of the EPOC trial.从醋酸格拉替雷或β干扰素转换为芬戈莫德对复发型多发性硬化症患者及医生报告结局的影响:EPOC试验的事后分析
BMC Neurol. 2014 Nov 26;14:220. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0220-1.
6
Effectiveness of multiple disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: causal inference to emulate a multiarm randomised trial.多种疾病修饰疗法在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的疗效:因果推理模拟多臂随机试验。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;94(12):1004-1011. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331499. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
7
Disability progression multiple sclerosis patients on fingolimod versus interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate.在芬戈莫德与干扰素-β/那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症患者的残疾进展比较。
Mult Scler. 2021 Mar;27(3):439-448. doi: 10.1177/1352458520918489. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Annualized relapse rate of first-line treatments for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis, including indirect comparisons versus fingolimod.一线多发性硬化治疗的年复发率:一项荟萃分析,包括与芬戈莫德的间接比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):767-80. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.681637. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.在复发缓解型多发性硬化症的二线治疗中,芬戈莫德的疗效优于注射用疾病修正疗法。
J Neurol. 2016 Feb;263(2):327-333. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7970-6. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
10
New FDA-Approved Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)新批准的用于治疗多发性硬化症的疾病修正疗法
Clin Ther. 2015 Apr 1;37(4):691-715. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
EDSS and infratentorial white matter lesion volume are considered predictors of fatigue severity in RRMS.EDSS 和小脑白质病变体积被认为是 RRMS 疲劳严重程度的预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38368-3.