Suppr超能文献

按年级水平和员工培训划分的过敏反应触发因素与治疗方法:来自EPIPEN4SCHOOLS试点调查的结果。

Anaphylaxis Triggers and Treatments by Grade Level and Staff Training: Findings from the EPIPEN4SCHOOLS Pilot Survey.

作者信息

White Martha V, Goss Diana, Hollis Kelly, Millar Kimrey, Silvia Suyapa, Siegel Peter H, Bennett M Elizabeth, Wooddell Margaret J, Hogue Susan L

机构信息

Institute for Asthma and Allergy, Wheaton, Maryland.

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

出版信息

Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2016 Jun;29(2):80-85. doi: 10.1089/ped.2015.0614.

Abstract

This pilot survey was designed to evaluate the characteristics of anaphylactic events and epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) use in children in U.S. schools. A cross-sectional, web-based, pilot survey of schools participating in the EPIPEN4SCHOOLS program (Mylan Specialty L.P., Canonsburg, PA) assessed characteristics of anaphylactic events and EAI use during the 2013-2014 academic year. Respondents reported 757 anaphylactic events experienced by students; student grade level was noted for 724 events. Of these events, 32.3% (234/724) were experienced by students in grade school, 18.6% (135/724) by students in middle school, and 49.0% (355/724) by students in high school. Frequency of food-related triggers was consistently high across grade levels. However, many events experienced by students in high school (22.3%, 79/355), middle school (15.0%, 20/135), and grade school (14.1%, 33/234) had an unknown trigger. In 36.0% of schools (2008/5579), only the school nurse and select staff received training to recognize anaphylaxis; most staff or all staff received training in 28.9% (1610/5579) and 30.9% (1722/5579) of schools, respectively. In a majority of schools (54.2%, 3003/5544), only the school nurse and select staff were permitted to administer epinephrine, whereas most staff or all staff were permitted to administer epinephrine in 15.8% (876/5544) and 21.9% (1212/5544) of schools, respectively. Risk of anaphylaxis may be particularly high during adolescence, and some students encounter staff members who are untrained in anaphylaxis recognition or management, or both. These findings support the need for continued anaphylaxis training for the protection of all students, staff, and visitors.

摘要

这项初步调查旨在评估美国学校中儿童过敏反应事件的特征以及肾上腺素自动注射器(EAI)的使用情况。对参与“EPIPEN4SCHOOLS”项目(迈兰特殊药品有限责任公司,宾夕法尼亚州卡农斯堡)的学校进行了一项基于网络的横断面初步调查,评估了2013 - 2014学年过敏反应事件的特征和EAI的使用情况。受访者报告了学生经历的757起过敏反应事件;其中724起事件记录了学生的年级。在这些事件中,小学学生经历的占32.3%(234/724),初中学生经历的占18.6%(135/724),高中学生经历的占49.0%(355/724)。各年级与食物相关的触发因素频率一直很高。然而,高中学生经历的许多事件(22.3%,79/355)、初中学生经历的(15.0%,20/135)以及小学学生经历的(14.1%,33/234)触发因素不明。在36.0%的学校(2008/5579)中,只有学校护士和部分工作人员接受了识别过敏反应的培训;分别有28.9%(1610/5579)和30.9%(1722/5579)的学校大部分工作人员或所有工作人员接受了培训。在大多数学校(54.2%,3003/5544)中,只有学校护士和部分工作人员被允许使用肾上腺素,而分别有15.8%(876/5544)和21.9%(1212/5544)的学校大部分工作人员或所有工作人员被允许使用肾上腺素。青春期过敏反应的风险可能特别高,而且一些学生遇到的工作人员未接受过过敏反应识别或处理方面的培训,或者两者都未接受过培训。这些发现支持继续开展过敏反应培训以保护所有学生、工作人员和访客的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验