Parker Timothy K, Jansen John, Behroozmand Ahmad-Ali, Halkjaer Max, Thorn Paul
Geophysics, Collier Consulting, 590 E. South Loop, Stephensville, TX, 76401.
Water Resources, Ramboll USA, 2200 Powell Street, Emeryville, CA, 94608.
Ground Water. 2022 Sep;60(5):606-618. doi: 10.1111/gwat.13235. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
Increasing water stress and decreasing supplies caused by growth and climate variability have expanded demand for managed aquifer recharge (MAR) projects to provide water supply resilience. Some of the most important factors in determining the performance of a MAR project include site selection, subsurface hydrogeologic characteristics and associated properties of the storage zone. Costs for invasive subsurface investigations to address these factors have slowly increased over the past two decades, with drilling costs increasing dramatically by as much as 30% or more since COVID-19 hit, a result of supply chain issues, steel prices, and manpower challenges. This paper provides a high-level review of major geophysical methods that have become more mainstream over the past decade or two to supplement invasive subsurface investigations and are very cost effective when compared to drilling boreholes and installing wells, which provide only point data. The more commonly used surface geophysical methods include ground-based and airborne time-domain electromagnetic methods (TEM), electrical resistivity, and seismic reflection. Airborne TEM methods (AEM) collect data very quickly, avoiding ground-based access constraints, and land-based methods are especially efficient using towed arrays. Electrical resistivity measurements provide resolution comparable to TEM but require more time than towed methods. Seismic reflection surveys are more expensive than other methods but typically have a much greater depth of penetration and can provide high resolution information on aquifer geometry, geology, and faults. Borehole geophysics is one of the more common methods used in MAR, providing near hole formation data and ground truths surface geophysics.
由于增长和气候变率导致的水资源压力增加和供应减少,对有管理的含水层补给(MAR)项目的需求不断扩大,以提高供水弹性。决定MAR项目性能的一些最重要因素包括选址、地下水文地质特征以及储存区的相关特性。过去二十年来,为解决这些因素而进行的侵入性地下调查成本缓慢上升,自新冠疫情爆发以来,钻探成本急剧增加了30%或更多,这是供应链问题、钢铁价格和人力挑战造成的。本文对过去一二十年中变得更加主流的主要地球物理方法进行了高层次综述,这些方法可补充侵入性地下调查,与仅提供点数据的钻孔和打井相比,成本效益非常高。更常用的地面地球物理方法包括地面和航空时域电磁法(TEM)、电阻率法和地震反射法。航空TEM方法(AEM)能够非常快速地收集数据,避免了地面进入限制,而地面方法使用拖曳阵列特别高效。电阻率测量提供的分辨率与TEM相当,但比拖曳方法需要更多时间。地震反射勘探比其他方法更昂贵,但通常穿透深度大得多,并且可以提供有关含水层几何形状、地质和断层的高分辨率信息。钻孔地球物理是MAR中使用较普遍的方法之一,可提供近孔地层数据和地面地球物理的地面实况。