Wang Yujie, Chen Yingwei, Xu Jixiang, Chen Hao, Gao Junling
School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Collaborative Innovation Cooperative Unit of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 15;13:948958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.948958. eCollection 2022.
Resilience is a multidimensional concept determining healthy aging, however, there were limited studies examining the association between frailty and resilience in detail. In this study, we aimed to examine the association of frailty with three dimensions of resilience-strength, optimism, and tenacity among Chinese older adults.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 10,209 participants who were sampled by three-stage sampling method, from three cities in China from June 2020 to July 2021. The Chinese version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) was used to measure resilience's 3 dimensions (strength, optimism and tenacity), which were converted into quartiles for the analysis. Frailty status was measured using the Chinese version of the FRAIL scale, categorized into robustness, pre-frailty and frailty. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between frailty status with strength, optimism and tenacity.
The overall proportions of robustness, pre-frailty, and frailty were 42.7, 48.7, and 8.6%, respectively. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, self-rated health, and health behaviors, compared with older adults with the lowest quartile of strength, older adults with the second quartile (odds ratio, OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.78), third quartile (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50-0.72), and fourth quartile (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.73) of strength had lower ORs for pre-frailty, and who also had lower ORs (0.44, 95% CI: 0.33-0.58; 0.42, 95% CI: 0.30-0.59; 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20-0.56, respectively) for frailty. There were no homogeneous associations between optimism and tenacity with frailty status.
Higher strength was associated with lower chance of being pre-frail and frail among Chinese older adults. This finding implies that community-based training programs aiming to enhance psychological resilience, especially strength, may contribute to healthy aging. Future studies should examine the effects of resilience on frailty using longitudinal or experimental study designs in cross-cultural contexts.
恢复力是一个决定健康老龄化的多维度概念,然而,详细研究衰弱与恢复力之间关联的研究有限。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨中国老年人衰弱与恢复力三个维度——力量、乐观和坚韧之间的关联。
于2020年6月至2021年7月在中国三个城市采用三阶段抽样方法对10209名参与者进行了横断面研究。使用中文版的康纳-戴维森恢复力量表(CD-RISC)来测量恢复力的三个维度(力量、乐观和坚韧),并将其转换为四分位数进行分析。使用中文版衰弱量表测量衰弱状态,分为健壮、衰弱前期和衰弱。采用多项逻辑回归分析衰弱状态与力量、乐观和坚韧之间的关联。
健壮、衰弱前期和衰弱的总体比例分别为42.7%、48.7%和8.6%。在控制了社会人口学特征、自评健康状况和健康行为后,与力量处于最低四分位数的老年人相比,力量处于第二四分位数(比值比,OR = 0.67,95%置信区间:0.57 - 0.78)、第三四分位数(OR = 0.60,95%置信区间:0.50 - 0.72)和第四四分位数(OR = 0.58,95%置信区间:0.46 - 0.73)的老年人衰弱前期的OR值较低,且衰弱的OR值也较低(分别为0.44,95%置信区间:0.33 - 0.58;0.42,95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.59;0.34,95%置信区间:0.20 - 0.56)。乐观和坚韧与衰弱状态之间没有一致的关联。
较高的力量与中国老年人处于衰弱前期和衰弱的较低几率相关。这一发现表明,旨在增强心理恢复力,尤其是力量的社区培训项目可能有助于健康老龄化。未来的研究应在跨文化背景下使用纵向或实验研究设计来检验恢复力对衰弱的影响。