Suppr超能文献

脑胎盘比率与无应激试验在预测妊娠期高血压疾病不良围产期结局中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究

Cerebroplacental Ratio Versus Nonstress Test in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Nayak Priyadarshini, Singh Sweta, Sethi Pruthwiraj, Som Tapas Kumar

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.

Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jun 30;14(6):e26462. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26462. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In developing countries, nonstress test (NST) is the most widely used method for antenatal fetal surveillance.Lately, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has emerged as a predictor for adverse perinatal outcomes, especially in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP). Against this background, the present study was conducted with the primary objective of quantifying the diagnostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) versus nonstress test (NST) in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in women with HDP.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary care institute in eastern India. All consecutive women with hypertension in pregnancy at a gestational age of ≥32 weeks were recruited into the study. Both CPR and NST were performed at baseline and repeated weekly till delivery. The parameters obtained within one week of delivery were entered for analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-two of the 65 women completed the study. There were 22 women (35.5%) in group A (both CPR and NST normal), 17 (27.4%) in group B (CPR abnormal, NST normal), 14 (22.6%) in group C (CPR normal and NST abnormal), and nine (14.5%) in group D (both CPR and NST abnormal). CPR had greater sensitivity (93.33% versus 46.67%), with higher positive predictive value (53.85% versus 30.43%), specificity (74.47% versus 65.91%), and negative predictive value (97.22% versus 79.49%) than NST for predicting neonatal intensive care unit admission. CPR also had higher sensitivity (84.62% versus 61.54%) and specificity (91.34% versus 69.39%) than NST in predicting neonatal complications. The negative predictive value (NPV) of CPR was 100% for predicting requirement of bag and mask ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure.

CONCLUSION

CPR had greater diagnostic accuracy in terms of both higher sensitivity and greater specificity than NST in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

摘要

引言

在发展中国家,无应激试验(NST)是产前胎儿监护最广泛使用的方法。最近,脑胎盘比率(CPR)已成为围产期不良结局的预测指标,尤其是在妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)中。在此背景下,本研究的主要目的是量化脑胎盘比率(CPR)与无应激试验(NST)在预测HDP女性围产期不良结局方面的诊断准确性。

方法

这是一项在印度东部一家三级医疗机构进行的前瞻性观察队列研究。所有孕周≥32周的连续妊娠高血压妇女均纳入研究。在基线时进行CPR和NST检查,并每周重复一次直至分娩。录入分娩前一周内获得的参数进行分析。

结果

65名妇女中有62名完成了研究。A组(CPR和NST均正常)有22名妇女(35.5%),B组(CPR异常,NST正常)有17名(27.4%),C组(CPR正常,NST异常)有14名(22.6%),D组(CPR和NST均异常)有9名(14.5%)。在预测新生儿重症监护病房入院方面,CPR的敏感性更高(93.33%对46.67%),阳性预测值更高(53.85%对30.43%),特异性更高(74.47%对65.91%),阴性预测值更高(97.22%对79.49%)。在预测新生儿并发症方面,CPR的敏感性(84.62%对61.54%)和特异性(91.34%对69.39%)也高于NST。CPR预测面罩通气和持续气道正压通气需求的阴性预测值(NPV)为100%。

结论

在预测妊娠期高血压疾病女性围产期不良结局方面,CPR在敏感性和特异性方面均比NST具有更高的诊断准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8214/9339373/ea5fd2e240ac/cureus-0014-00000026462-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验