Cleft Lip Repair Competence Can Be Evaluated with High-fidelity Simulation.

BACKGROUND

Demonstrating competency before independent practice is increasingly important in surgery. This study tests the hypothesis that a high-fidelity cleft lip simulator can be used to discriminate performance between training levels, demonstrating its utility for assessing procedural competence.

METHODS

During this prospective cohort study, participants performed a unilateral cleft lip repair on a high-fidelity simulator. Videos were blindly rated using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and the Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Competency Assessment Tool (UCLR). Digital measurement of symmetry was estimated. Influence of training level and cumulative prior experience on each score was estimated using Pearson r.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 26) ranged from postgraduate year 3 to craniofacial fellow. Training level correlated best with UCLR (R = 0.4842, = 0.0122*) and more weakly with OSATS (R = 0.3645, = 0.0671), whereas cumulative prior experience only weakly correlated with UCLR (R = 0.3450, = 0.0843) and not with OSATS (R = 0.1609, = 0.4323). UCLR subscores indicated marking the repair had little correlation with training level (R = 0.2802, = 0.1656), whereas performance and result did (R = 0.5152, = 0.0071*, R = 0.4226, = 0.0315*, respectively). Correlation between symmetry measures and training level was weak.

CONCLUSIONS

High-fidelity simulation paired with an appropriate procedure-specific assessment tool has the construct validity to evaluate performance for cleft lip repair. Simply being able to mark a cleft lip repair is not an accurate independent assessment method nor is symmetry of the final result.