Suppr超能文献

这次不同吗?——关于新冠疫情期间紧急措施的使用

This time is different?-on the use of emergency measures during the corona pandemic.

作者信息

Bjørnskov Christian, Voigt Stefan

机构信息

University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Law Econ. 2022;54(1):63-81. doi: 10.1007/s10657-021-09706-5. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has not only caused millions to die and even more to lose their jobs, it has also prompted more governments to simultaneously declare a state of emergency than ever before enabling us to compare their decisions more directly. States of emergency usually imply the extension of executive powers that diminishes the powers of other branches of government, as well as to the civil liberties of individuals. Here, we analyze the use of emergency provisions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and find that it can be largely explained by drawing on political economy. It does, hence, not constitute an exception. We show that many governments have (mis-)used the pandemic as a pretext to curtail media freedom. We further show that executive decrees are considered as a substitute for states of emergency by many governments.

摘要

新冠疫情不仅导致数百万人死亡,更多人失去工作,还促使更多政府同时宣布进入紧急状态,这使我们能够更直接地比较它们的决策。紧急状态通常意味着行政权力的扩大,这会削弱政府其他部门的权力,以及个人的公民自由。在此,我们分析了新冠疫情第一波期间紧急条款的使用情况,发现很大程度上可以从政治经济学角度进行解释。因此,这并不构成例外。我们表明,许多政府以疫情为借口(错误地)限制媒体自由。我们还表明,许多政府将行政法令视为紧急状态的替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea0/8313876/2a2623d6995f/10657_2021_9706_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验