Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 4;17(8):e0270957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270957. eCollection 2022.
Determining the dynamics of where and when individuals occur is necessary to understand population declines and identify critical areas for populations of conservation concern. However, there are few examples where a spatially and temporally explicit model has been used to evaluate the migratory dynamics of a bird population across its entire annual cycle. We used geolocator-derived migration tracks of 84 Dunlin (Calidris alpina) on the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) to construct a migratory network describing annual subspecies-specific migration patterns in space and time. We found that Dunlin subspecies exhibited unique patterns of spatial and temporal flyway use. Spatially, C. a. arcticola predominated in regions along the eastern edge of the flyway (e.g., western Alaska and central Japan), whereas C. a. sakhalina predominated in regions along the western edge of the flyway (e.g., N China and inland China). No individual Dunlin that wintered in Japan also wintered in the Yellow Sea, China seas, or inland China, and vice-versa. However, similar proportions of the 4 subspecies used many of the same regions at the center of the flyway (e.g., N Sakhalin Island and the Yellow Sea). Temporally, Dunlin subspecies staggered their south migrations and exhibited little temporal overlap among subspecies within shared migration regions. In contrast, Dunlin subspecies migrated simultaneously during north migration. South migration was also characterized by individuals stopping more often and for more days than during north migration. Taken together, these spatial-temporal migration dynamics indicate Dunlin subspecies may be differentially affected by regional habitat change and population declines according to where and when they occur. We suggest that the migration dynamics presented here are useful for guiding on-the-ground survey efforts to quantify subspecies' use of specific sites, and to estimate subspecies' population sizes and long-term trends. Such studies would significantly advance our understanding of Dunlin space-time dynamics and the coordination of Dunlin conservation actions across the EAAF.
确定个体出现的地点和时间的动态对于了解种群下降和确定保护关注种群的关键区域是必要的。然而,很少有例子使用空间和时间上明确的模型来评估鸟类种群在整个年度周期中的迁徙动态。我们使用东亚-澳大拉西亚迁徙路线(EAAF)上 84 只黑腹滨鹬(Calidris alpina)的地理定位器衍生的迁徙轨迹,构建了一个迁徙网络,描述了年度亚种特异性的迁徙模式在空间和时间上的情况。我们发现,黑腹滨鹬亚种表现出独特的空间和时间迁徙路线使用模式。在空间上,C. a. arcticola 主要分布在迁徙路线的东部边缘地区(如,阿拉斯加西部和日本中部),而 C. a. sakhalina 主要分布在迁徙路线的西部边缘地区(如,中国北部和内陆中国)。在日本越冬的黑腹滨鹬个体没有一个也在黄海、中国海域或内陆中国越冬,反之亦然。然而,4 个亚种中有相似比例的个体使用了迁徙路线中心的许多相同区域(如,北萨哈林岛和黄海)。在时间上,黑腹滨鹬亚种错开了它们的南迁,并在共享迁徙区域内的亚种之间几乎没有时间重叠。相比之下,黑腹滨鹬亚种在北迁期间同时迁徙。南移的特点是个体停止的次数更多,停留的天数也比北移时多。总的来说,这些时空迁徙动态表明,黑腹滨鹬亚种可能会根据它们出现的地点和时间,受到区域生境变化和种群下降的不同影响。我们建议,这里提出的迁徙动态对于指导实地调查工作是有用的,可以用来量化亚种对特定地点的使用情况,并估计亚种的种群数量和长期趋势。这些研究将极大地提高我们对黑腹滨鹬时空动态的理解,并协调东亚-澳大拉西亚迁徙路线上的黑腹滨鹬保护行动。