Suppr超能文献

长期和严重的医用大麻和大麻素对慢性疼痛的危害:非随机研究的系统评价。

Long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis and cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review of non-randomised studies.

机构信息

Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e054282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054282.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL from inception to 1 April 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Non-randomised studies reporting on harms of medical cannabis or cannabinoids in adults or children living with chronic pain with ≥4 weeks of follow-up.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A parallel guideline panel provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of adverse events for consideration. Two reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, screened the search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used random-effects models for all meta-analyses and the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

We identified 39 eligible studies that enrolled 12 143 adult patients with chronic pain. Very low certainty evidence suggests that adverse events are common (prevalence: 26.0%; 95% CI 13.2% to 41.2%) among users of medical cannabis for chronic pain, particularly any psychiatric adverse events (prevalence: 13.5%; 95% CI 2.6% to 30.6%). Very low certainty evidence, however, indicates serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, cognitive adverse events, accidents and injuries, and dependence and withdrawal syndrome are less common and each typically occur in fewer than 1 in 20 patients. We compared studies with <24 weeks and ≥24 weeks of cannabis use and found more adverse events reported among studies with longer follow-up (test for interaction p<0.01). Palmitoylethanolamide was usually associated with few to no adverse events. We found insufficient evidence addressing the harms of medical cannabis compared with other pain management options, such as opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

There is very low certainty evidence that adverse events are common among people living with chronic pain who use medical cannabis or cannabinoids, but that few patients experience serious adverse events.

摘要

目的

确定医用大麻治疗慢性疼痛的长期和严重危害的流行率。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

从建库至 2020 年 4 月 1 日,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 CENTRAL 中检索。

研究选择

非随机研究报告了在慢性疼痛患者中使用医用大麻或大麻素的危害,随访时间≥4 周。

数据提取和综合

一个平行的指南小组就系统评价的设计和解释提供了意见,包括考虑不良事件的选择。两名审查员独立工作并重复审查,筛选检索结果,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们对所有荟萃分析均使用随机效应模型,并使用推荐、评估、开发和评估分级法(Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach)评估证据的确定性。

结果

我们确定了 39 项符合条件的研究,这些研究纳入了 12143 名患有慢性疼痛的成年患者。有非常低确定性证据表明,医用大麻治疗慢性疼痛的使用者中常见不良事件(发生率:26.0%;95%CI 13.2%至 41.2%),特别是任何精神科不良事件(发生率:13.5%;95%CI 2.6%至 30.6%)。然而,有非常低确定性证据表明,严重不良事件、导致停药的不良事件、认知不良事件、意外和伤害以及依赖和戒断综合征较少见,每种情况通常发生在不到 1/20 的患者中。我们比较了使用大麻时间<24 周和≥24 周的研究,发现随访时间较长的研究报告的不良事件更多(检验交互作用,p<0.01)。棕榈酸乙醇酰胺通常与很少或没有不良事件相关。我们发现,与其他疼痛管理方法(如阿片类药物)相比,医用大麻的危害证据不足。

结论

有非常低确定性证据表明,慢性疼痛患者使用医用大麻或大麻素时常见不良事件,但很少有患者发生严重不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9de/9358949/aeb0dfa9eb06/bmjopen-2021-054282f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验