• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期和急诊结直肠手术后主要并发症再次手术后的抢救失败:一项基于人群的多中心队列研究。

Failure to rescue after reoperation for major complications of elective and emergency colorectal surgery: A population-based multicenter cohort study.

机构信息

Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: http://www.twitter.com/LauraKoskenvuo.

出版信息

Surgery. 2022 Oct;172(4):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.052. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.052
PMID:35927079
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As surgical complications inevitably occur, minimizing the failure-to-rescue rate is of paramount interest. Most of the failure-to-rescue research in colorectal surgery has previously focused on elective surgery and anastomotic dehiscence. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare the major postoperative complications demanding reoperation after elective versus emergency colorectal surgery, and to the identify risk factors for failure-to-rescue.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective multicenter cohort study, adult patients undergoing a reoperation for colorectal surgery complication between 2006 and 2017 in 10 hospitals were included. The data were manually extracted. Failure-to-rescue was defined as 90-day mortality after the reoperation.

RESULTS

In total, 14,290 patients underwent index colorectal resection, of which 862 (5.8%) underwent emergency reoperation within 30 days (438 [4.3%] after elective, 424 [10.4%] after emergency index operation, P < .001). The failure-to-rescue overall rate was 17.4% (8.0% after elective vs 27.1% after emergency index operation, P < .001). The 4 most common complications were anastomotic dehiscence (36.6%, 316 patients), fascial rupture (23.5%, 203 patients), intra-abdominal bleeding (15.3%, 131 patients), and bowel obstruction (10.2%, 88 patients). The majority (640 patients, 74.2%) had 1 of these complications; 261 patients (30.3%) had multiple complications. In multivariable analyses, the only possibly preventable independent risk factor for failure-to-rescue was perioperative organ failure at the time of reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Major complications requiring reoperation occur more than twice as often after emergency surgery and have a higher failure-to-rescue rate of >3× compared with elective surgery. The 4 most common complication types constitute three-fourths of the complications, providing a target for quality improvement.

摘要

背景

由于手术并发症不可避免,因此将抢救失败率降至最低至关重要。以前大多数关于结直肠手术抢救失败的研究都集中在择期手术和吻合口裂开上。本研究旨在描述和比较择期与急诊结直肠手术后需要再次手术的主要术后并发症,并确定抢救失败的危险因素。

方法

在这项基于人群的回顾性多中心队列研究中,纳入了 2006 年至 2017 年期间在 10 家医院因结直肠手术并发症而再次手术的成年患者。数据通过人工提取。抢救失败定义为再次手术后 90 天内的死亡率。

结果

共 14290 例患者接受了指数结直肠切除术,其中 862 例(5.8%)在 30 天内行急诊再次手术(438 例[4.3%]在择期手术,424 例[10.4%]在急诊手术),P<0.001)。抢救失败的总发生率为 17.4%(择期手术为 8.0%,急诊手术为 27.1%,P<0.001)。最常见的 4 种并发症是吻合口裂开(36.6%,316 例)、筋膜破裂(23.5%,203 例)、腹腔内出血(15.3%,131 例)和肠梗阻(10.2%,88 例)。大多数患者(640 例,74.2%)有一种并发症;261 例患者(30.3%)有多种并发症。多变量分析显示,再次手术时围手术期器官衰竭是唯一可能预防的独立抢救失败危险因素。

结论

急诊手术后需要再次手术的主要并发症发生率是择期手术的两倍多,抢救失败率高达 3 倍以上。最常见的 4 种并发症类型占并发症的四分之三,为质量改进提供了目标。

相似文献

1
Failure to rescue after reoperation for major complications of elective and emergency colorectal surgery: A population-based multicenter cohort study.择期和急诊结直肠手术后主要并发症再次手术后的抢救失败:一项基于人群的多中心队列研究。
Surgery. 2022 Oct;172(4):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.052. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Perioperative outcomes of emergency and elective colorectal surgery: a bi-institutional study.急诊与择期结直肠手术的围手术期结局:一项双机构研究
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Apr;93(4):926-931. doi: 10.1111/ans.18091. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术的机械性肠道准备
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD001544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.
4
Impact of hospital volume on failure to rescue for complications requiring reoperation after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.择期结直肠手术后因需要再次手术的并发症而导致抢救失败的医院容量影响:多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Mar 1;8(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae025.
5
Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure?在择期腹腔镜结直肠手术中常规使用术中内镜:它能进一步避免吻合口失败吗?
Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0416-4. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
6
Prospective multicentre study of a new bowel obstruction treatment in colorectal surgery: Reduced morbidity and mortality.前瞻性多中心研究新型结直肠手术肠阻塞治疗方法:降低发病率和死亡率。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2414-2420. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Parenteral Nutrition Instead of Early Reoperation in the Management of Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction.肠外营养而非早期手术在治疗术后早期小肠梗阻中的应用。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):109-114. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04347-1. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
8
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术的机械性肠道准备
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4.
9
Feasibility of a tailored ERAS programme in octogenarian patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.对行微创结直肠手术的 80 岁以上老年患者实施 ERAS 方案的可行性。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;32(2):265-273. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01195-6. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
10
Postoperative complications in individuals aged 70 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer.70 岁及以上接受择期结直肠癌手术的个体的术后并发症。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;19(9):O329-O338. doi: 10.1111/codi.13821.

引用本文的文献

1
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy for Complicated Colorectal Disease in Emergency Settings.急诊情况下复杂结直肠疾病的手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术
JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00039. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
2
How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.衰老如何影响结直肠腹腔镜手术后的抢救失败。对一个高容量单一中心的1000例患者进行分析。
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02173-6.
3
Analyzing postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review enhanced by artificial intelligence.
分析结直肠癌手术的术后并发症:一项由人工智能辅助的系统评价
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 31;11:1452223. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1452223. eCollection 2024.
4
Artificial intelligence in surgery.外科手术中的人工智能
Nat Med. 2024 May;30(5):1257-1268. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02970-3. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
LapEmerge trial: study protocol for a laparoscopic approach for emergency colon resection-a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial.LapEmerge 试验:腹腔镜紧急结肠切除术的研究方案——一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Apr 17;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08058-0.
6
Outcomes of elective liver surgery worldwide: a global, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study.全球择期肝外科手术结局:一项全球性、前瞻性、多中心、横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3954-3966. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000711.