• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出生体重图表在预测与 SGA 相关的不良围产结局方面在初产妇队列中的表现。

Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.

Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04943-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04943-1
PMID:35927626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9351115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small-for-gestational-age neonates (SGA) are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity. Nulliparity represents a risk factor for SGA; birthweight charts may perform differently for the detection of SGA among nulliparas. This study aimed at describing the prevalence of SGA in nulliparas according to different birthweight charts and evaluating the diagnostic performance of these charts to maternal and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a Brazilian cohort of nulliparas named Preterm SAMBA study. Birthweight centiles were calculated using the Intergrowth-21st, WHO-Fetal Growth Charts, Birth in Brazil population chart and GROW-customised chart. The risks of outcomes among SGA neonates and their mothers in comparison to neonates with birthweights between the 40-60 centiles were calculated, according to each chart. ROC curves were used to detect neonatal morbidity in neonates with birth weights below different cutoff centiles for each chart.

RESULTS

A sample of 997 nulliparas was assessed. The rate of SGA infants varied between 7.0-11.6%. All charts showed a significantly lower risk of caesarean sections in women delivering SGA neonates compared to those delivering adequate-for-gestational-age neonates (OR 0.55-0.64, p < .05). The charts had poor performance (AUC 0.492 - 0.522) for the detection of neonatal morbidity related to SGA born at term.

CONCLUSION

The populational and customised birthweight charts detected different prevalence of small-for-gestational-age neonates and showed similar and poor performance to identify related neonatal adverse outcomes in this population.

摘要

背景

小于胎龄儿(SGA)新生儿患新生儿发病率的风险增加。初产妇是 SGA 的一个危险因素;体重图表在初产妇中检测 SGA 的性能可能不同。本研究旨在根据不同的体重图表描述初产妇中 SGA 的患病率,并评估这些图表对母婴围产结局的诊断性能。

方法

这是巴西初产妇早产儿 SAMBA 研究的一项二次分析。使用 Intergrowth-21st、世卫组织胎儿生长图表、巴西出生人口图表和 GROW 定制图表计算体重百分位数。根据每个图表,计算 SGA 新生儿及其母亲与体重在 40-60 百分位数之间的新生儿相比发生结局的风险。使用 ROC 曲线检测每个图表中低于不同截止百分位数的新生儿体重的新生儿发病率。

结果

评估了 997 名初产妇的样本。SGA 婴儿的发生率在 7.0-11.6%之间。所有图表均显示,与分娩适于胎龄儿的产妇相比,分娩 SGA 新生儿的产妇剖宫产的风险显著降低(OR 0.55-0.64,p <.05)。这些图表在检测足月出生的与 SGA 相关的新生儿发病率方面表现不佳(AUC 0.492-0.522)。

结论

人群和定制的体重图表检测到不同的小于胎龄儿发生率,并且在该人群中识别相关的新生儿不良结局的性能相似且不佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/85598dc98cf4/12884_2022_4943_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/9e95d6cde820/12884_2022_4943_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/500b9e601b7c/12884_2022_4943_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/85598dc98cf4/12884_2022_4943_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/9e95d6cde820/12884_2022_4943_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/500b9e601b7c/12884_2022_4943_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8669/9351115/85598dc98cf4/12884_2022_4943_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas.出生体重图表在预测与 SGA 相关的不良围产结局方面在初产妇队列中的表现。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04943-1.
2
Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.识别适用于早产儿人群的最佳生长图表:一项澳大利亚全州回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 4;16(10):e1002923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002923. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.使用人群、定制和生长图表确定与不良围产结局相关的出生体重百分位数阈值:一项基于人群的瑞典队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 20;16(9):e1002902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002902. eCollection 2019 Sep.
4
INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.在足月时不良围产期结局的检测中,将INTERGROWTH-21st与GROW定制百分位数进行比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Mar;33(6):961-966. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1511696. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Performance of the INTERGROWTH-21 and World Health Organization fetal growth charts for the detection of small-for-gestational age neonates in Latin America.INTERGROWTH-21和世界卫生组织胎儿生长发育图表在拉丁美洲用于检测小于胎龄儿的性能。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;161(3):1083-1091. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14657. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
6
Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial.用于识别患有 1 型糖尿病的母亲所生的大于胎龄儿和小于胎龄儿的生长标准应该是什么?CONCEPTT 试验的预先指定分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 29;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6.
7
Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jul;92(4):F277-80. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.108621. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
8
Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.六种出生体重和估计胎儿体重标准预测不良围产结局的性能:一项全国性的 10 年基于人群的研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):264-277. doi: 10.1002/uog.22151.
9
Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.比较 INTERGROWTH-21 世纪和 Hadlock 生长标准预测小于胎龄儿和短期新生儿结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;33(11):1906-1912. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1533945. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
10
INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.INTERGROWTH-21st标准与定制出生体重标准用于围产期死亡率和发病率的识别比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):509.e1-509.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.931. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of an enhanced fetal growth ultrasound protocol on pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective service evaluation within a single UK National Health Service centre between 2014 and 2022.强化胎儿生长超声检查方案对妊娠结局的影响:2014年至2022年期间在英国单一国民健康服务中心进行的一项回顾性服务评估。
Ultrasound. 2024 Nov 8:1742271X241287925. doi: 10.1177/1742271X241287925.

本文引用的文献

1
Maternal Risk Factors for Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns in Mexico: Analysis of a Nationwide Representative Cohort.墨西哥小于胎龄儿的产妇危险因素:一项全国代表性队列分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;9:707078. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.707078. eCollection 2021.
2
FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)胎儿生长倡议:胎儿生长受限筛查、诊断及管理的最佳实践建议
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-57. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13522.
3
Risk stratification for small for gestational age for the Brazilian population: a secondary analysis of the Birth in Brazil study.
巴西人群中小胎儿生长受限的风险分层:巴西出生研究的二次分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71252-y.
4
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction.国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)实践指南:小于胎龄儿和胎儿生长受限的诊断与管理
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;56(2):298-312. doi: 10.1002/uog.22134.
5
Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.六种出生体重和估计胎儿体重标准预测不良围产结局的性能:一项全国性的 10 年基于人群的研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):264-277. doi: 10.1002/uog.22151.
6
Perinatal outcomes from preterm and early term births in a multicenter cohort of low risk nulliparous women.多中心低危初产妇队列中早产和早期足月产的围产结局。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 22;10(1):8508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65022-z.
7
Incidence and risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy among nulliparous women: A Brazilian multicenter cohort study.初产妇妊娠期间高血糖的发生率及相关因素:巴西多中心队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232664. eCollection 2020.
8
Neonatal morbidity and small and large size for gestation: a comparison of birthweight centiles.新生儿发病率与胎龄大小和体重:出生体重百分位的比较。
J Perinatol. 2020 May;40(5):732-742. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0631-3. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.使用人群、定制和生长图表确定与不良围产结局相关的出生体重百分位数阈值:一项基于人群的瑞典队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 20;16(9):e1002902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002902. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Incidence and risk factors for Preeclampsia in a cohort of healthy nulliparous pregnant women: a nested case-control study.健康初产妇子痫前期的发生率及危险因素:巢式病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 2;9(1):9517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46011-3.