Veten Ahmed, Davis Joshua, Kavanagh Robert, Thomas Neal, Zurca Adrian
Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021 Feb 17;11(3):254-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723949. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Optimal practices for the placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) in critically ill children are unclear. This study describes the clinical practice of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) providers regarding CVC placement, including site selection, confirmation practices and assessment of complications. Two-hundred fourteen PCCM providers responded to an electronic survey, including 170 (79%) attending physicians, 30 (14%) fellow physicians, and 14 (7%) advanced practice providers. PCCM providers most commonly place internal jugular (IJ) and femoral CVCs, with subclavian CVCs and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed less commonly (IJ 99%, femoral 95%, subclavian 40%, PICC 19%). The IJ is the most preferred site (128/214 (60%)); decreased infection risk is the most common reason for preferring this site. The subclavian is the least preferred site (150/214 [70%]) due to concern for increased risk of complications (51%) and personal discomfort with the procedure (49%). One-hundred twenty-six (59%) of respondents reported receiving formal ultrasound (US) or echocardiography training. Respondents reported using dynamic US guidance for placement in 90% of IJ, 86% of PICC, 78% of femoral, and 12% of subclavian CVCs. Plain radiography (X-ray) was the most preferred modality for confirming CVC tip position (85%) compared with US (9%) and no imaging (5%). Most providers reported using X-ray to evaluate for pneumothorax following upper extremity CVC placement, with only 5% reporting use of US and none relying on physical exam alone. This study demonstrates wide variability in PCCM providers' CVC placement practices. Potential training gaps exist for placement of subclavian catheters and use of US.
在危重症儿童中放置中心静脉导管(CVC)的最佳做法尚不清楚。本研究描述了儿科重症医学(PCCM)提供者在CVC放置方面的临床实践,包括部位选择、确认方法和并发症评估。214名PCCM提供者回复了一项电子调查,其中包括170名(79%)主治医师、30名(14%)住院医师和14名(7%)高级执业提供者。PCCM提供者最常放置颈内静脉(IJ)和股静脉CVC,锁骨下CVC和经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)放置较少(IJ 99%,股静脉95%,锁骨下40%,PICC 19%)。IJ是最优选的部位(128/214(60%));感染风险降低是选择该部位最常见的原因。锁骨下是最不优选的部位(150/214[70%]),原因是担心并发症风险增加(51%)和个人对该操作的不适(49%)。126名(59%)受访者报告接受过正式的超声(US)或超声心动图培训。受访者报告在90%的IJ、86%的PICC、78%的股静脉和12%的锁骨下CVC放置中使用动态US引导。与US(9%)和无影像学检查(5%)相比,普通X线摄影(X线)是确认CVC尖端位置最优选的方式(85%)。大多数提供者报告使用X线评估上肢CVC放置后的气胸情况,只有5%报告使用US,没有人仅依靠体格检查。本研究表明PCCM提供者在CVC放置实践中存在很大差异。锁骨下导管放置和US使用方面存在潜在的培训差距。