He Mengxue, Huang Qin, Lu Hong, Gu Ying, Hu Yan, Zhang Xiaobo
School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 19;13:860438. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.860438. eCollection 2022.
Children have a higher risk of medication errors (MEs) than adults. The Institute for Safe Medication Practice (ISMP) defined high-alert medications (HAMs) as a group of medications that could cause significant patient harm or even death when they are used in error. Nurses are actively involved in and responsible for patient care, especially in medication administration. This study aimed to estimate the knowledge, decision-making basis and confidence and decision support needs related to HAMs among pediatric nurses in China. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted among pediatric nurses who were recruited from 14 member hospitals of the Pediatric Nursing Alliance of National Children's Medical Center in China using a convenient sampling technique. Data were collected using a self-administered instrument composed of four parts: the demographic characteristics of participants, participants' knowledge about HAMs, participants' self-evaluation of the basis of and confidence in decision-making, and decision support needs regarding HAMs. Among the participants, the maximum score for HAM knowledge was 100. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS 20.0. A total of 966 nurses participated in this study. Nurses were found to have insufficient knowledge about HAMs, with a median (IQR) of 75.0 (70.0, 80.0), out of a maximum score of 100. Knowledge about HAM administration was significantly higher than that about HAM regulation, with a value < 0.001. The three lowest-scoring items concerned HAM regulation, and the "Treat fentanyl skin patches as a regulated narcotic" item obtained the lowest score, with only 1/5 of respondents answering it correctly. Most participants reported that their basis for decision-making about HAMs was drug instructions (90.0%) or drug handbooks (81.9%) and evaluated their confidence in decision-making about HAMs as high or relatively high (84.6%). The decision-making difficulties when encountering HAMs focused on most stages of HAM administration, especially the appropriateness of prescriptions, checks, preparation and administration. The vast majority of participants assessed decision support as necessary or very necessary (92.0%), and the most popular options for decision support were computerized clinical decision support systems (46.4%) and real-time online communication with pharmacists (23.9%). Our study demonstrated the inadequacies in HAM knowledge, the basis and difficulty of decision-making, and decision support needs regarding HAMs in Chinese pediatric nurses. Nurses need greater support in HAM administration, including not only training but also adequate technology, mutually beneficial interprofessional collaboration, and a positive institutional culture.
儿童比成人发生用药错误(MEs)的风险更高。安全用药实践研究所(ISMP)将高警示药品(HAMs)定义为一组一旦使用错误可能对患者造成重大伤害甚至死亡的药品。护士积极参与并负责患者护理,尤其是在给药过程中。本研究旨在评估中国儿科护士对高警示药品的知识、决策依据、信心以及决策支持需求。采用便利抽样技术,对来自中国国家儿童医学中心儿科护理联盟14家成员医院的儿科护士进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。使用一份由四部分组成的自填式问卷收集数据:参与者的人口统计学特征、参与者对高警示药品的知识、参与者对决策依据和信心的自我评估,以及对高警示药品的决策支持需求。在参与者中,高警示药品知识的最高分为100分。所有数据均使用SPSS 20.0录入并分析。共有966名护士参与了本研究。发现护士对高警示药品的知识不足,中位数(四分位间距)为75.0(70.0,80.0),满分100分。关于高警示药品给药的知识显著高于关于高警示药品管理规定的知识,P值<0.001。得分最低的三个项目与高警示药品管理规定有关,“将芬太尼透皮贴剂视为管制麻醉药品”这一项目得分最低,只有五分之一的受访者回答正确。大多数参与者报告说,他们对高警示药品决策的依据是药品说明书(90.0%)或药品手册(81.9%),并将他们对高警示药品决策的信心评估为高或相对较高(84.6%)。遇到高警示药品时的决策困难集中在高警示药品给药的大多数阶段上,尤其是处方的适宜性、核对、配制和给药。绝大多数参与者认为决策支持是必要的或非常必要的(92.0%),最受欢迎的决策支持选项是计算机化临床决策支持系统(46.4%)和与药剂师实时在线沟通(23.9%)。我们的研究表明,中国儿科护士在高警示药品知识、决策依据和困难以及决策支持需求方面存在不足问题。护士在高警示药品给药方面需要更多支持,这不仅包括培训,还包括适当的技术、互利的跨专业协作以及积极的机构文化。