Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Surg. 2022 Sep 9;109(10):968-976. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac263.
Expert recommendations propose the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a core outcome measure in surgical studies, yet data on its long-term measurement properties remain limited. These were evaluated in a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) prospective cohort.
Participants were adults (40 years of age or older) who underwent inpatient non-cardiac surgery. The 12-item WHODAS and EQ-5DTM-3L questionnaires were administered preoperatively (in person) and 1 year postoperatively (by telephone). Responsiveness was characterized using standardized response means (SRMs) and correlation coefficients between change scores. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation coefficients between 1-year scores and comparisons of WHODAS scores across clinically relevant subgroups.
The analysis included 546 patients. There was moderate correlation between changes in WHODAS and various EQ-5DTM subscales. The strongest correlation was between changes in WHODAS and changes in the functional domains of the EQ-5D-3L-for example, mobility (Spearman's rho 0.40, 95 per cent confidence interval [c.i.] 0.32 to 0.48) and usual activities (rho 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.52). When compared across quartiles of EQ-5D index change, median WHODAS scores followed expected patterns of change. In subgroups with expected functional status changes, the WHODAS SRMs ranged from 'small' to 'large' in the expected directions of change. At 1 year, the WHODAS demonstrated convergence with the EQ-5D-3L functional domains, and good discrimination between patients with expected differences in functional status.
The WHODAS questionnaire has construct validity and responsiveness as a measure of functional status at 1 year after major surgery.
专家建议将世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)2.0 作为外科研究的核心结果测量指标,但关于其长期测量特性的数据仍然有限。这些特性在手术前运动耐量测量(METS)前瞻性队列的二次分析中进行了评估。
参与者为接受非心脏住院手术的成年人(40 岁或以上)。在术前(亲自)和术后 1 年(通过电话)对 12 项 WHODAS 和 EQ-5DTM-3L 问卷进行了管理。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)和变化分数之间的相关系数来描述反应能力。通过比较 1 年评分和临床相关亚组的 WHODAS 评分,评估了结构有效性。
该分析包括 546 名患者。WHODAS 变化与 EQ-5DTM 各子量表之间存在中度相关性。最强的相关性是 WHODAS 变化与 EQ-5D-3L 的功能领域变化之间的相关性,例如,移动性(Spearman 的 rho 0.40,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.32 至 0.48)和日常活动(rho 0.45,95%CI 为 0.30 至 0.52)。在按 EQ-5D 指数变化的四分位数进行比较时,WHODAS 中位数评分遵循预期的变化模式。在预期功能状态变化的亚组中,WHODAS 的 SRM 范围从“小”到“大”,变化方向与预期一致。在 1 年时,WHODAS 与 EQ-5D-3L 功能领域具有一致性,并且能够很好地区分预期功能状态存在差异的患者。
WHODAS 问卷具有结构有效性和反应能力,可作为主要手术后 1 年功能状态的测量指标。