Corson J D, Chang B B, Shah D M, Leather R P, DeLeo B M, Karmody A M
Arch Surg. 1987 Jul;122(7):807-12. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400190073014.
This study compared the technique of general and regional cervical block anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Three hundred sixty-eight patients undergoing 399 carotid endarterectomies were administered one of these alternative anesthetics as selected preoperatively by each patient and his or her physician. In 242 cases general anesthesia was used. The other 157 cases were done under regional cervical block anesthesia. Perioperative mortality was 1.0%. Nonfatal strokes occurred in 1.25%. There were significantly more strokes in the general anesthesia group. Perioperative blood pressure was unstable for a significantly longer period of time after general anesthesia (mean, 24.6 hours) as compared with regional cervical block anesthesia (mean, 2.1 hours). Furthermore, vasoactive drugs were required for significantly longer periods of time in the general anesthesia group.
本研究比较了颈总动脉内膜切除术的全身麻醉和局部颈丛阻滞麻醉技术。368例接受399次颈总动脉内膜切除术的患者,由每位患者及其医生术前选择,接受其中一种麻醉方式。242例采用全身麻醉,另外157例采用局部颈丛阻滞麻醉。围手术期死亡率为1.0%,非致命性中风发生率为1.25%。全身麻醉组的中风发生率明显更高。与局部颈丛阻滞麻醉(平均2.1小时)相比,全身麻醉后围手术期血压不稳定的时间明显更长(平均24.6小时)。此外,全身麻醉组需要使用血管活性药物的时间明显更长。