Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Dec;37(6):1155-1166. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07363-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
In-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) represents a unique challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether the optimal treatment for IS-CTO is angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) or repeat stenting with drug-eluting stents (DESs) is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of PCB angioplasty and DES repeat stenting for DES IS-CTO.
We retrospectively included patients with DES IS-CTO who underwent successful PCB angioplasty or DES repeat stenting from January 2016 to December 2019. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Cox proportional hazards model was performed to compare the risk of MACEs between PCB angioplasty and DES repeat stenting, and to further explore the prognostic factors of patients with DES IS-CTO.
A total of 214 patients with DES IS-CTO were enrolled: 78 patients (36.4%) treated with PCB and 136 patients (63.6%) treated with DES respectively. The median follow-up was 1160 days, and MACEs were observed in 28.2% of patients with PCB angioplasty versus 26.5% of patients with DES repeat stenting (P = 0.784), mainly driven by TLR (21.8% vs. 19.9%, P = 0.735). There was no significant difference in the risk of MACEs between the PCB group and the DES group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-2.46, P = 0.512). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that chronic kidney disease and ≥ 3 stent layers in the lesion were independent predictors of MACEs, while switching to another antiproliferative drug was an independent protective factor (all P < 0.05).
PCB angioplasty was an effective alternative treatment strategy for DES IS-CTO, which had similar long-term outcomes to DES repeat stenting in contemporary practice, but both were accompanied by a high rate of long-term MACEs. Improving the poor prognosis of patients with DES IS-CTO remains a challenge.
支架内慢性完全闭塞(IS-CTO)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一个独特挑战。对于 IS-CTO,紫杉醇涂层球囊(PCBs)血管成形术还是药物洗脱支架(DES)重复支架置入的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 PCB 血管成形术和 DES 重复支架置入治疗 DES-ISCTO 的长期临床结局。
我们回顾性纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月接受成功的 PCB 血管成形术或 DES 重复支架置入治疗的 DES-ISCTO 患者。主要终点为主要不良心脏事件(MACE),包括心脏死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建(TLR)。采用 Cox 比例风险模型比较 PCB 血管成形术和 DES 重复支架置入治疗的 MACE 风险,并进一步探讨 DES-ISCTO 患者的预后因素。
共纳入 214 例 DES-ISCTO 患者:78 例(36.4%)接受 PCB 治疗,136 例(63.6%)接受 DES 治疗。中位随访时间为 1160 天,PCB 血管成形术组患者的 MACE 发生率为 28.2%,DES 重复支架置入组为 26.5%(P=0.784),主要由 TLR 驱动(21.8% vs. 19.9%,P=0.735)。PCB 组和 DES 组的 MACE 风险无显著差异(风险比[HR] 1.25,95%置信区间[CI] 0.64-2.46,P=0.512)。多变量 Cox 分析显示,慢性肾脏病和病变中≥3 个支架层是 MACE 的独立预测因素,而改用另一种抗增殖药物是独立的保护因素(均 P<0.05)。
PCB 血管成形术是 DES-ISCTO 的有效替代治疗策略,与当代实践中 DES 重复支架置入相比,其具有相似的长期结局,但两者均伴有较高的长期 MACE 发生率。改善 DES-ISCTO 患者的预后仍然是一个挑战。