Li Peng, Li Hongfei, Cheng Yalin, Meng Xuyang, Yang Chenguang, Li Huimin, Ji Fusui, Zhang Wenduo
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):5314-5322. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-969. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
The effects of the drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only strategy in the treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO) coronary lesions remain controversial. Patients who underwent an in-stent restenosis (ISR) CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) had a significantly poorer prognosis than those who underwent a CTO PCI. This retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of the DCB-only strategy in the treatment of CTO lesions, and the factors associated with adverse events in the patients.
Patients with CTO lesions who were treated with the DCB-only strategy from 1 January 2016 to 1 May 2021 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients were stratified into the ISR and (primary) groups. All the patients were re-admitted to the hospital and underwent clinical and/or angiographic follow-up.
Of the 68 patients with CTO lesions, 38 (55.9%) were categorized as having ISR, and 30 (44.1%) were categorized as having lesions. The outcomes measured included target lesion revascularization (TLR), lumen gain after intervention, and late lumen loss (LLL). After an average follow-up period of 16 months, a total of 15 patients experienced target lesion failure (13 in the ISR group and 2 in the group). The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) was significantly lower in the group than the ISR group (10% 39%, P=0.004). There was a significant difference in LLL between the two groups, with the group showing a decrease (-0.04±0.83 mm) and the ISR group showing an increase (0.97±1.45 mm) (P=0.03). The univariable Cox proportional hazard analyses revealed that the incidence of TLR was independently associated with the stenosis type (either ISR or lesions) [odds ratio (OR): 7.28; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.494-35.464; P=0.01]. Male gender (OR: 3.726; 95% CI: 1.014-12.818; P=0.03) and body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.246; 95% CI: 1.022-1.518, P=0.03) were also associated with the incidence of TLR. However, after adjusting for the variables of age, gender, and BMI, no significant association was found between MACE occurrence and ISR (OR: 4.156, 95% CI: 0.734-23.522; P=0.11).
Treatment using the DCB-only strategy was found to be beneficial for patients suffering from CTO coronary lesions, especially those presenting with lesions.
单纯药物涂层球囊(DCB)策略治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞(CTO)病变的效果仍存在争议。接受支架内再狭窄(ISR)CTO经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者预后明显比接受CTO PCI的患者差。本回顾性分析评估了单纯DCB策略治疗CTO病变的疗效和安全性,以及与患者不良事件相关的因素。
回顾性纳入2016年1月1日至2021年5月1日采用单纯DCB策略治疗的CTO病变患者。患者被分为ISR组和(原发)组。所有患者再次入院并接受临床和/或血管造影随访。
68例CTO病变患者中,38例(55.9%)被归类为ISR,30例(44.1%)被归类为病变。测量的结果包括靶病变血运重建(TLR)、干预后管腔增益和晚期管腔丢失(LLL)。平均随访16个月后,共有15例患者发生靶病变失败(ISR组13例,组2例)。组的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率显著低于ISR组(10%对39%,P = 0.004)。两组间LLL有显著差异,组呈下降趋势(-0.04±0.83mm),ISR组呈上升趋势(0.97±1.45mm)(P = 0.03)。单变量Cox比例风险分析显示,TLR的发生率与狭窄类型(ISR或病变)独立相关[比值比(OR):7.28;95%置信区间(CI):1.494 - 35.464;P = 0.01]。男性(OR:3.726;95%CI:1.014 - 12.818;P = 0.03)和体重指数(BMI)(OR:1.246;95%CI:1.022 - 1.518,P = 0.03)也与TLR的发生率相关。然而,在调整年龄、性别和BMI变量后,未发现MACE发生与ISR之间存在显著关联(OR:4.156,95%CI:0.734 - 23.522;P = 0.11)。
发现单纯DCB策略治疗对患有CTO冠状动脉病变的患者有益,尤其是那些表现为病变的患者。