• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情封锁期间远程康复治疗脊柱疼痛的疗效:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析

Efficacy of telerehabilitation for spine pain during the Coronavirus pandemic lockdown: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Shah Nidhi, Shetty Gautam M, Kanna Raj, Thakur Harshad

机构信息

National Clinical Expert & Senior Spine Physiotherapist, QI Spine Clinic, Mumbai, India.

Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Head of Reseach, QI Spine Clinic, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):558-565. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2107718. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1080/17483107.2022.2107718
PMID:35930451
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite increased usage of telemedicine to deliver treatment during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the efficacy of telerehabilitation for spine pain is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of telerehabilitation on pain and disability in patients with spine pain treated during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare the results to in-clinic rehabilitation.

MATERIALS & METHODS: In this propensity score-matched analysis, 428 patients with spine pain who underwent telerehabilitation during the 6 months of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and 428 patients who underwent in-clinic multimodal rehabilitation treatment during the 6-month period prior to lockdown were compared. Propensity score matching was done based on gender, age, pre-treatment pain, and disability. Post-treatment numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Oswestry or Neck disability index (ODI or NDI), and minimal clinical important difference (MCID) achieved for NPRS and ODI/NDI scores were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Post-treatment, the mean NPRS (mean difference - 1,  < 0.0001) and ODI/NDI (mean difference - 5.8,  < 0.0001) scores, were significantly lower in the telerehabilitation group when compared to control group. Similarly, the percentage of patients who achieved MCID of ≥ 2 for NPRS (mean difference - 6%,  = 0.0007) and MCID of ≥ 10 for ODI/NDI (mean difference - 7.5%,  = 0.005) scores were significantly higher in the telerehabilitation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Telerehabilitation achieved significant reduction in pain and disability among patients with spine pain, better than in-clinic rehabilitation. These encouraging results during the COVID-19 pandemic indicate the need to further explore and test the efficacy and wider application of telerehabilitation for treating spine pain.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONTelerehabilitation can help achieve significant reduction in pain and disability among patients with spine pain.These encouraging results indicate the need to further explore a wider application of telerehabilitation for treating patients with spine pain during non-pandemic times.

摘要

目的

尽管在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间远程医疗用于提供治疗的情况有所增加,但远程康复治疗脊柱疼痛的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查远程康复对COVID-19大流行期间接受治疗的脊柱疼痛患者疼痛和残疾状况的影响,并将结果与门诊康复进行比较。

材料与方法

在这项倾向评分匹配分析中,比较了428例在COVID-19大流行封锁的6个月期间接受远程康复的脊柱疼痛患者和428例在封锁前6个月期间接受门诊多模式康复治疗的患者。倾向评分匹配基于性别、年龄、治疗前疼痛和残疾状况进行。比较两组治疗后数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、奥斯维斯特或颈部残疾指数(ODI或NDI)以及NPRS和ODI/NDI评分达到的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

结果

治疗后,与对照组相比,远程康复组的平均NPRS(平均差值 -1,<0.0001)和ODI/NDI(平均差值 -5.8,<0.0001)评分显著更低。同样,NPRS达到MCID≥2的患者百分比(平均差值 -6%,=0.0007)和ODI/NDI达到MCID≥10的患者百分比(平均差值 -7.5%,=0.005)在远程康复组中显著更高。

结论

远程康复使脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛和残疾状况显著减轻,优于门诊康复。在COVID-19大流行期间这些令人鼓舞的结果表明,需要进一步探索和测试远程康复治疗脊柱疼痛的疗效及更广泛应用。

对康复的启示

远程康复有助于显著减轻脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛和残疾状况。

这些令人鼓舞的结果表明,有必要进一步探索在非大流行时期更广泛地应用远程康复来治疗脊柱疼痛患者。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of telerehabilitation for spine pain during the Coronavirus pandemic lockdown: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.新冠疫情封锁期间远程康复治疗脊柱疼痛的疗效:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):558-565. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2107718. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Predictors of failure to achieve minimal clinical important difference for pain and disability after mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT)-based multimodal rehabilitation for neck pain: a retrospective analysis of 4998 patients.机械诊断和治疗(MDT)为基础的多模式康复治疗后,颈痛患者疼痛和残疾未达到最小临床重要差异的预测因素:4998 例患者的回顾性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2022 May;31(5):1291-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07167-1. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
3
Efficacy of an integrated, active rehabilitation protocol in patients ≥ 65 years of age with chronic mechanical low back pain.≥65 岁慢性机械性下腰痛患者综合主动康复方案的疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Mar;29(3):586-595. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06248-y. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Does Patient Body Mass Index Affect the Outcome of Multimodal Rehabilitation in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain?患者体重指数是否会影响慢性机械性下腰痛的多模式康复治疗效果?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Oct 1;46(19):1336-1343. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004000.
5
Moving from the clinic to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic - a pilot clinical trial comparing in-clinic rehabilitation versus telerehabilitation for persisting symptoms following a mild Traumatic brain injury.在新冠疫情期间从门诊转向远程医疗——一项比较轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续症状的门诊康复与远程康复的试点临床试验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jun;46(13):2880-2889. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2236016. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Effect of adjuvant frequency-specific microcurrents on pain and disability in patients treated with physical rehabilitation for neck and low back pain.辅助频特异性微电流对颈腰痛物理康复治疗患者疼痛和残疾的影响。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?脊柱疾病患者 PROMIS、NDI 和 ODI 量表的 MCID 是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
8
The effect of psychosocial measures of resilience and self-efficacy in patients with neck and lower back pain.心理社会因素(韧性和自我效能)对颈痛和腰痛患者的影响。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
9
The effect of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on oswestry disability index scores: a comparative cross-sectional study.COVID-19 封锁限制对 Oswestry 残疾指数评分的影响:一项比较性横断面研究。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Nov;31(11):2844-2850. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07382-w. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
Effects of elongation longitudinaux avec decoaption osteo-articulaire and post-facilitation stretching technique on pain and functional disability in mobile users with text neck syndrome during COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial.COVID-19 大流行期间,使用关节切断术和后促进伸展技术对患有颈型文字工作者综合征的活动受限患者的疼痛和功能障碍的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 24;102(12):e33073. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033073.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal stabilization exercises for transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus thickness via telerehabilitation and face-to-face approaches in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.经远程康复和面对面两种方式对非特异性慢性颈痛患者行腹横肌和多裂肌厚度的脊柱稳定练习:一项随机对照试验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 12;54(4):811-821. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5853. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of Telerehabilitation Combining Diaphragmatic Breathing Re-Education and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Neck Pain, Posture, and Function in Young Adult Men with Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.远程康复结合膈肌呼吸再训练和肩部稳定练习对患有上交叉综合征的年轻成年男性颈部疼痛、姿势和功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 11;13(6):1612. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061612.
3
Effect of traditional rehabilitation programme versus telerehabilitation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cohort study.新冠疫情期间特发性脊柱侧凸青少年接受传统康复方案与远程康复的效果比较:一项队列研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb 26;56:jrm5343. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.5343.