QI Spine Clinic, #6 Level 2 Phoenix Market City, LBS Road, Kamani, Kurla (West), Mumbai, 400070, India.
I.T.S College of Physiotherapy, Ghaziabad, India.
Eur Spine J. 2022 May;31(5):1291-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07167-1. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
To determine predictors of failure to achieve minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for pain and disability at discharge after mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT)-based multimodal rehabilitation for neck pain (NP).
Pre- and post-treatment numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and neck disability index (NDI) in patients with mechanical NP were analysed in this retrospective study. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the effect of covariates such as age, gender, lifestyle, body mass index, presentation, diabetes, osteoporosis, response to repeated movement testing, treatment sessions, compliance rate, and pre-treatment NPRS and NDI scores on failure to achieve MCID of ≥ 30% for NPRS and NDI scores post-treatment.
In the 4998 patients analysed for this study, 7% and 14.5% of patients failed to achieve MCID for NPRS and NDI scores, respectively, at the end of treatment. Age > 70 years, diabetes, osteoporosis, partial or non-response to repeated movements, lesser treatment sessions, and lower compliance rate were associated with increased risk for failure to achieve MCID for NPRS and NDI scores. A higher pre-treatment NDI score was associated with failure to achieve MCID for NPRS score, whereas lower pre-treatment NPRS and NDI scores were associated with failure to achieve MCID for NDI score.
Although MDT-based multimodal rehabilitation helped to achieve significant reduction in pain and disability in mechanical NP, several baseline risk factors were associated with failure to achieve MCID for pain and disability after treatment. Identifying and modifying these factors as part of rehabilitation treatment may help to achieve better outcomes in mechanical NP.
确定机械诊断和治疗(MDT)为基础的多模式康复治疗后颈痛(NP)患者出院时疼痛和残疾未达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的预测因素。
本回顾性研究分析了机械 NP 患者治疗前后的数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。进行多变量分析,以调查年龄、性别、生活方式、体重指数、表现、糖尿病、骨质疏松症、对重复运动测试的反应、治疗次数、依从率以及治疗前 NPRS 和 NDI 评分等协变量对治疗后 NPRS 和 NDI 评分 MCID 增加 ≥ 30%的影响。
在这项研究中,对 4998 名患者进行了分析,其中 7%和 14.5%的患者在治疗结束时分别未达到 NPRS 和 NDI 评分的 MCID。年龄>70 岁、糖尿病、骨质疏松症、对重复运动的部分或无反应、治疗次数较少以及较低的依从率与 NPRS 和 NDI 评分 MCID 增加的风险增加相关。较高的治疗前 NDI 评分与 NPRS 评分 MCID 失败相关,而较低的治疗前 NPRS 和 NDI 评分与 NDI 评分 MCID 失败相关。
尽管 MDT 为基础的多模式康复治疗有助于显著减轻机械 NP 的疼痛和残疾,但一些基线风险因素与治疗后疼痛和残疾未达到 MCID 有关。确定并修改这些因素作为康复治疗的一部分,可能有助于在机械 NP 中获得更好的结果。