Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Ithaca College, NY.
Speech and Hearing Sciences Department, Portland State University, OR.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):2962-2977. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00442. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
This study compared global coherence (GC) in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) to a healthy older adult (HOA) group during single (sitting) and dual (stationary cycling) tasks. Additionally, it explored the relationship between GC and cognition in PD.
Thirty-seven individuals with PD and 19 HOAs participated in the prospective, cross-sectional study. Participants completed discourse monologues elicited using published prompts while seated and while pedaling a stationary bicycle. Four rating levels of GC were analyzed (GC1 = no relationship to the topic, GC2 = remote relationship, GC3 = conditional relationship, and GC4 = complete relationship) using a published protocol with good interrater reliability and test-retest stability. Participants completed a battery of cognitive tasks, from which four latent factors were extracted: processing speed, working memory, inhibition, and updating.
Linear mixed modeling identified significant effects of GC level and GC level interactions with group, processing speed, and inhibition. The Group × GC Level interaction reflected that the PD group had a higher proportion of GC2 and GC1 utterances and fewer GC4 utterances than the HOA group. No differences between single and dual task conditions were found. Faster speed of processing predicted more GC4 utterances, whereas slower speed of processing predicted more G1 utterances. Better inhibition predicted fewer GC2 utterances. Group also predicted GC4 and GC2 proportions.
Individuals with PD experienced greater difficulties with GC than HOAs. Processing speed and inhibition contributed significantly to GC across groups. Analysis of GC should be considered an informative addition to assessment of communicative effectiveness in PD.
本研究比较了帕金森病(PD)个体在单任务(坐姿)和双任务(固定自行车运动)期间的整体连贯性(GC)与健康老年人(HOA)组之间的差异。此外,还探讨了 PD 患者 GC 与认知之间的关系。
37 名 PD 患者和 19 名 HOA 参加了这项前瞻性、横断面研究。参与者在坐姿和固定自行车运动时,使用已发表的提示完成话语独白。使用具有良好的组内信度和测试-重测稳定性的已发表协议分析了 4 个 GC 等级(GC1 = 与主题无关系,GC2 = 远程关系,GC3 = 条件关系,GC4 = 完全关系)。参与者完成了一系列认知任务,从中提取了 4 个潜在因素:处理速度、工作记忆、抑制和更新。
线性混合模型确定了 GC 水平和 GC 水平与组、处理速度和抑制之间的交互作用的显著影响。组×GC 水平的交互作用反映了 PD 组的 GC2 和 GC1 话语比例较高,GC4 话语比例较低,而 HOA 组则相反。在单任务和双任务条件之间未发现差异。处理速度越快,GC4 话语越多,而处理速度越慢,GC1 话语越多。抑制越好,GC2 话语越少。组也预测了 GC4 和 GC2 的比例。
PD 患者的 GC 比 HOA 患者更困难。处理速度和抑制对所有组的 GC 都有重要贡献。GC 分析应被视为 PD 患者交流有效性评估的一种有价值的补充。