Department of Paediatric Neurology University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Neurology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2022 Sep;40:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
In young children with early onset ataxia (EOA), quantitative rating of ataxia by the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is longitudinally influenced by the physiological age effect on motor coordination. To enable longitudinal quantitative interpretation of ataxia by SARA in children with EOA, the EPNS ataxia working group has previously determined SARA-scores in typically developing children (4-16 years of age). In toddlers, this information is still lacking. We therefore aimed to investigate the feasibility and reliability of SARA-scores in typically developing toddlers.
In 57 typically developing toddlers (2-4 years), we aimed to determine the: 1. feasibility of SARA-scores, 2. age-related pre-requisites to obtain SARA-scores in toddlers over all domains, 3. SARA-score reliability, 4. mathematical age connection of SARA-scores in toddlers and older children.
In typically developing toddlers, the feasibility of SARA is strongly age-dependent (p < .000). After computing compensations for two age-related, unfeasible and therefore un-assessable kinetic subtasks and after allowing the videotaping of non-kinetic SARA sub-task performances at home, the SARA was fully reliably assessable in all (n = 57) toddlers (ICC = 0.732). From two to 16 years of age, SARA-scores were mathematically represented by one continuous, exponentially decreasing trend line approaching the adult-optimum at 16 years of age.
In toddlers, SARA-scores are reliably assessable, by using two age-compensations and allowing the videotaping of SARA-performances partly at home. In children with EOA, these data enable longitudinal quantification and interpretation of quantitative ataxia-scores by SARA from 2 years of age throughout childhood.
在早期发病的共济失调的幼儿中(EOA),通过共济失调评估和评分量表(SARA)对共济失调进行定量评分会受到运动协调的生理年龄影响。为了能够通过 SARA 对 EOA 患儿进行纵向定量分析,EPNS 共济失调工作组之前已经确定了正常发育儿童(4-16 岁)的 SARA 评分。但在幼儿中,这方面的信息仍然缺乏。因此,我们旨在研究 SARA 评分在正常发育幼儿中的可行性和可靠性。
在 57 名正常发育的幼儿(2-4 岁)中,我们旨在确定:1. SARA 评分的可行性;2. 在所有领域获得幼儿 SARA 评分的与年龄相关的前提条件;3. SARA 评分的可靠性;4. 幼儿和大龄儿童 SARA 评分的数学年龄关联。
在正常发育的幼儿中,SARA 的可行性强烈依赖于年龄(p<.000)。在计算了两个与年龄相关的、不可行的且因此无法评估的运动学子任务的补偿后,以及允许在家中录制非运动学 SARA 子任务的录像后,所有(n=57)幼儿的 SARA 均可完全可靠地评估(ICC=0.732)。从 2 岁到 16 岁,SARA 评分通过一条连续的、指数递减的趋势线表示,该趋势线在 16 岁时接近成人最佳值。
在幼儿中,通过使用两个年龄补偿并允许在家中录制 SARA 表现的录像,可以可靠地评估 SARA 评分。在 EOA 患儿中,这些数据可以使 SARA 从 2 岁开始对儿童期的定量共济失调评分进行纵向量化和解释。