• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线外周动脉疾病教育材料的可读性评估。

Readability assessment of online peripheral artery disease education materials.

机构信息

Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; West Los Angeles Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1728-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.022
PMID:35931399
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Online resources can be a valuable source of information for patients and have been shown to result in more inquiry during medical office visits, following physician medical recommendation more closely, and making self-directed lifestyle changes. The accessibility to these resources is limited by the readability level of the article and the literacy level of the population. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is estimated to affect between 8 and 12 million people in the United States with greater disease severity among under insured or uninsured populations. As PAD continues to increase in prevalence, it is imperative that patients have access to comprehensible patient-centered health information. This study aims to evaluate the readability of online PAD patient education materials.

METHODS

The search engine Google was used to collect the first 25 patient-accessible online articles pertaining to the search term "peripheral artery disease." Articles were then categorized by source type: hospital, professional society, or other. Readability was measured using the following tests: Automated Readability Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, Linsear Write Formula, and the SMOG Index. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software, with P values less than .05 being statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were categorized by source and statistically analyzed. The average readability of PAD patient education materials was 10.8 and significantly above the American Medical Association, National Institutes of Health, and US Department of Health and Human Services recommended reading level of sixth grade. Readability scores among source categories were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly available online PAD resources are written at a grade level above that currently recommended by medical societies. Hospitals, professional societies, and other stakeholders in PAD patient education should take into consideration the readability of their materials to make medicine more accessible. Readable articles may combat the historic and structural racism often found in our health care system that marginalizes those with lower health literacy. It is imperative to develop patient education at an appropriate level to enrich patient autonomy.

摘要

目的

在线资源可以成为患者的有价值信息来源,并且已经证明可以在就诊期间增加更多的查询,更密切地遵循医生的医疗建议,并进行自我指导的生活方式改变。这些资源的可访问性受到文章的可读性和人口的识字水平的限制。外周动脉疾病 (PAD) 估计在美国影响 800 万至 1200 万人,在保险不足或没有保险的人群中疾病严重程度更高。随着 PAD 的患病率持续上升,患者必须能够获得通俗易懂的以患者为中心的健康信息。本研究旨在评估在线 PAD 患者教育材料的可读性。

方法

使用搜索引擎 Google 收集与搜索词“外周动脉疾病”相关的前 25 篇患者可访问的在线文章。然后根据来源类型对文章进行分类:医院、专业协会或其他。使用以下测试来衡量可读性:自动可读性指数、Coleman-Liau 指数、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、Gunning Fog、Linsear 写作公式和 SMOG 指数。使用统计分析软件进行统计分析,P 值小于.05 为统计学显著。

结果

对 25 篇文章进行了分类和统计分析。PAD 患者教育材料的平均可读性为 10.8,明显高于美国医学协会、美国国立卫生研究院和美国卫生与公众服务部推荐的六年级阅读水平。来源类别的可读性评分没有显著差异。

结论

常用的在线 PAD 资源的编写水平高于医学协会目前推荐的水平。PAD 患者教育的医院、专业协会和其他利益相关者应考虑其材料的可读性,以使医学更易于理解。易读的文章可能会消除我们的医疗保健系统中经常存在的历史性和结构性种族主义,这种种族主义使那些健康素养较低的人处于不利地位。开发适当水平的患者教育对于增强患者自主性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Readability assessment of online peripheral artery disease education materials.在线外周动脉疾病教育材料的可读性评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1728-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
2
Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.西班牙语在线外周动脉疾病患者教育材料的可读性不符合推荐标准,代表了患者获取医疗服务的读写能力障碍。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment.脂蛋白(a)相关在线患者教育材料:可读性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e31284. doi: 10.2196/31284.
5
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Graft-Versus-Host Disease.移植物抗宿主病在线患者教育材料的可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1363-1366. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02271-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
8
Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.美国鼻科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Apr;3(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/alr.21097. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
9
Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish.英文和西班牙文的肩部不稳定手术在线患者教育材料的可读性
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2220-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.028. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.心理社会健康患者资源的可读性:改善手术效果。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.外周动脉疾病教育中的人工智能:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的较量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Readability, reliability and quality of responses generated by ChatGPT, gemini, and perplexity for the most frequently asked questions about pain.ChatGPT、Gemini和Perplexity针对最常见疼痛问题生成的回答的可读性、可靠性和质量。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 14;104(11):e41780. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041780.
3
Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
评估有关琼斯骨折的在线信息的可读性。
World J Methodol. 2023 Dec 20;13(5):439-445. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439.
4
Readability of Online Information on Core Decompression of the Hip for Avascular Necrosis.关于股骨头缺血性坏死髋关节核心减压的在线信息可读性
Cureus. 2023 Dec 10;15(12):e50298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50298. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Readability of Online Information on the Latarjet Procedure.关于拉塔热手术的在线信息可读性。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49184. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49184. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations.使用传统方法评估妇产科在线患者教育材料的可读性:比较分析与局限性。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 30;25:e46346. doi: 10.2196/46346.