• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估有关琼斯骨折的在线信息的可读性。

Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.

作者信息

Al-Kharouf Khaled Farid Khaled, Khan Faisal Idrees, Robertson Greg Aj

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, Portsmouth PO6 3 LY, United Kingdom.

Internal Medicine, Tunbridge Wells Hospital, Tunbridge Wells E10 5NJ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

World J Methodol. 2023 Dec 20;13(5):439-445. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439.

DOI:10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439
PMID:38229937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10789098/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand in hand with technological advancements, treatment modalities continue to grow. With the turn of the century, the internet has become the number one source of information for almost every topic. Thus, many patients look toward the internet as their primary source of information to learn about their respective medical conditions. The American Medical Association and National Institute of Health strongly recommend that online medical information be written at the 6 to 8-grade level to aid comprehension by patients of all literacy backgrounds.

AIM

To assess the readability of online information regarding Jones fracture. Our hypothesis is that the reading level of medical information published on websites far exceeds the recommended reading level of 6-8 grade as proposed by the American Medical Associate and National Institute of Health. The result of this study can help us formulate improved recommendations for publishing more comprehensible material and, thus, eventually improve patient compliance and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The exact phrase "Jones fracture" was queried on the three most common search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and Bing, on December 28, 2022. As of December 2022, Google held 84%, Bing held 9%, and Yahoo! held 2% of the worldwide search engine market share. Web pages uniform resource locator from the first three pages of search results were recorded from each search engine. These web pages were classified according to academic, physician-sponsored, governmental and non-government organizations (NGO), commercial, and unspecified as per formally defined categories. Websites associated with an educational institution or medical organization were classified as academic. Websites with products for sale, corporate sponsorship, or advertisements were classified as commercial. Governmental websites or NGOs comprised those that received government subsidies or grants. Webpages that were independently owned by physicians or physician groups were respectively classed as physician sponsored. The remainder of websites that did not fall under the above categories were classified as unspecified.

RESULTS

A total of 93 websites were analyzed for reading assessment. A whopping 44% of websites were commercial, followed by 22% of physician-sponsored websites. Third place belonged to non-government organization websites holding a 15% share. The academic website held a meager 9% portion, while unspecified sites were 3%. The table illustrates mean readability scores, along with average cumulative grade level. The average grade level was 10.95 ± 2.28 for all websites, with a range of 6.18 to 18.90. Since values were more than 0.05, there was not a significant statistical difference between the first page results and the results of all pages. Thus, we can rationalize that readability scores are consistent throughout all pages of a website.

CONCLUSION

Hand in hand with technological advancements, treatment modalities continue to grow. With the turn of the century, the internet has become the number one source of information for almost every topic. Thus, many patients look towards the internet as the primary source of information to learn about their respective medical conditions. Our study demonstrates that current online medical information regarding Jones fracture is written at an extraordinarily high-grade level, with an average grade level of all websites at 10.95, nearly an 10-grade educational level. The American Medical Association and National Institute of Health strongly recommend that online medical information should be written at the 6 to 8-grade level to aid comprehension by patients of all literacy backgrounds. On the contrary, most of the medical information evaluated was at an 10-grade level, which far exceeds recommendations by AMA and NIH. This is particularly relevant because readability scores are directly proportional to the level of comprehension attained by readers, thus directly impacting patient outcomes. In conclusion, we suggest and encourage that all online reading materials should be re-written at the 6 to 8-grade level in a public service effort to increase compliance with treatment goals and raise awareness of preventive measures.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53e2/10789098/f31b191aa9dd/WJM-13-439-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53e2/10789098/645575f0cf79/WJM-13-439-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53e2/10789098/f31b191aa9dd/WJM-13-439-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53e2/10789098/645575f0cf79/WJM-13-439-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53e2/10789098/f31b191aa9dd/WJM-13-439-g002.jpg
摘要

背景

随着技术进步,治疗方式不断增加。进入21世纪,互联网已成为几乎所有主题的首要信息来源。因此,许多患者将互联网视为了解自身病情的主要信息来源。美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院强烈建议,在线医疗信息应以6至8年级的阅读水平编写,以帮助不同文化程度的患者理解。

目的

评估有关琼斯骨折的在线信息的可读性。我们的假设是,网站上发布的医疗信息的阅读水平远远超过美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院建议的6至8年级阅读水平。本研究结果可帮助我们制定改进建议,以发布更易懂的材料,从而最终提高患者的依从性和临床疗效。

方法

2022年12月28日,在谷歌、雅虎和必应这三个最常用的搜索引擎上查询了确切短语“琼斯骨折”。截至2022年12月,谷歌在全球搜索引擎市场份额中占84%,必应占9%,雅虎占2%。记录每个搜索引擎搜索结果前三页的网页统一资源定位符。这些网页根据学术、医生赞助、政府和非政府组织(NGO)、商业以及未分类(根据正式定义的类别)进行分类。与教育机构或医疗组织相关的网站归类为学术网站。有产品出售、企业赞助或广告的网站归类为商业网站。政府网站或非政府组织包括那些接受政府补贴或资助的网站。由医生或医生团体独立拥有的网页分别归类为医生赞助。不属于上述类别的其余网站归类为未分类。

结果

共分析了93个网站的阅读情况。高达44%的网站是商业网站,其次是22%的医生赞助网站。非政府组织网站占15%,位居第三。学术网站仅占9%,未分类网站占3%。表格列出了平均可读性得分以及平均累计年级水平。所有网站的平均年级水平为10.95±2.28,范围为6.18至18.90。由于P值大于0.05,首页结果与所有页面结果之间没有显著统计学差异。因此,我们可以推断网站所有页面的可读性得分是一致的。

结论

随着技术进步,治疗方式不断增加。进入21世纪,互联网已成为几乎所有主题的首要信息来源。因此,许多患者将互联网视为了解自身病情的主要信息来源。我们的研究表明,当前有关琼斯骨折的在线医疗信息的编写水平极高,所有网站的平均年级水平为10.95,接近10年级的教育水平。美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院强烈建议,在线医疗信息应以6至8年级的阅读水平编写,以帮助不同文化程度的患者理解。相反,大多数评估的医疗信息处于10年级水平,远远超过了美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院的建议。这一点尤为重要,因为可读性得分与读者的理解水平成正比,从而直接影响患者的治疗效果。总之,我们建议并鼓励所有在线阅读材料应以6至8年级的阅读水平重新编写,以提高患者对治疗目标的依从性并增强预防措施的意识。

相似文献

1
Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.评估有关琼斯骨折的在线信息的可读性。
World J Methodol. 2023 Dec 20;13(5):439-445. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439.
2
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Achilles Tendon Ruptures.评估关于跟腱断裂的在线信息的可读性。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2020 Dec;13(6):470-477. doi: 10.1177/1938640019888058. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.评估关于髋关节镜手术的在线信息的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2142-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.039. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
4
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
5
IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.下腔静脉滤器 - 评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101695. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101695. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
6
Assessing the readability of patient-targeted online information on musculoskeletal radiology procedures.评估面向患者的肌肉骨骼放射学程序在线信息的可读性。
Skeletal Radiol. 2021 Jul;50(7):1379-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03562-1. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
7
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?新的联邦乳房密度立法的效果会否因目前可获得的在线患者教育材料而减弱?
Acad Radiol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1400-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.主要政府、非营利组织和制药机构的在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.下背痛影像学:可读性分析
Cureus. 2023 Sep 13;15(9):e45174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45174. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability assessment of online peripheral artery disease education materials.在线外周动脉疾病教育材料的可读性评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1728-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
2
Readability of Patient Education Materials From High-Impact Medical Journals: A 20-Year Analysis.高影响力医学期刊中患者教育材料的可读性:一项为期20年的分析。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Mar 3;8:2374373521998847. doi: 10.1177/2374373521998847. eCollection 2021.
3
Jones Fracture Management in Athletes.运动员琼斯骨折的治疗
Orthop Clin North Am. 2020 Oct;51(4):541-553. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
4
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Achilles Tendon Ruptures.评估关于跟腱断裂的在线信息的可读性。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2020 Dec;13(6):470-477. doi: 10.1177/1938640019888058. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
5
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.评估关于髋关节镜手术的在线信息的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2142-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.039. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
6
Assessment of Quality and Content of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.髋关节镜在线信息的质量与内容评估
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):2082-2089. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
The Expectation Game: Patient Comprehension Is a Determinant of Outcome.期望博弈:患者的理解程度是结果的决定因素。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2283-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.09.005.
8
Understanding of Meniscus Injury and Expectations of Meniscus Surgery in Patients Presenting for Orthopaedic Care.接受骨科治疗的患者对半月板损伤的认识及对半月板手术的期望
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2295-300.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
9
Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet.评估互联网上前交叉韧带重建信息的质量和内容。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1095-100. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
10
The jones fracture classification, management, outcome, and complications: a systematic review.琼斯骨折的分类、治疗、结果及并发症:一项系统评价
Foot Ankle Spec. 2012 Aug;5(4):256-9. doi: 10.1177/1938640012444730. Epub 2012 Apr 30.